Thomas,
After reading the forthcoming 6MAN slides, about MIPv6 in Node
Requirements, let me draw attention on the NEMOv6 RFC3963, absent from
the slides.
I believe NEMOv6 RFC3963 should be mentioned too, because it is an
extension to RFC3775 and has been implemented. RFC3775 doesn't cite
Hi,
Alexandru Petrescu alexandru.petre...@gmail.com writes:
I tend to think MIPv6 RO is not deployed in CNs, at least not as wide as
expected.
With respect to Raj's earlier suggestion, I wouldn't agree substituting
RFC for RFC3775, i.e. to use DSMIPv6 instead of Mobile IPv6 -
because
The document currently says:
8. Mobile IP
The Mobile IPv6 [RFC3775] specification defines requirements for the
following types of nodes:
- mobile nodes
- correspondent nodes with support for route optimization
- home agents
- all IPv6 routers
Hi Thomas,
On 7/24/09 10:41 AM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The document currently says:
8. Mobile IP
The Mobile IPv6 [RFC3775] specification defines requirements for the
following types of nodes:
- mobile nodes
- correspondent nodes with support for
I tend to think MIPv6 RO is not deployed in CNs, at least not as wide as
expected.
With respect to Raj's earlier suggestion, I wouldn't agree substituting
RFC for RFC3775, i.e. to use DSMIPv6 instead of Mobile IPv6 -
because Mobile IPv6 and Mobile IPv4 have been used successfully for this
