Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-08-02 Thread Tim Chown
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:22:09PM +0900, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote: > > Additionally, > at v6ops session yesterday, 6net people showed us another > possible usage of address selection policy table. It's renumbering. > By pouring address selection policy into each end hosts, > you can easily configu

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris - IPv6 Full Standard thoughts

2005-08-02 Thread elwynd
In the course of doing the security overview draft in v6ops, we identified a number of issues that appear to be errata or issues with the main IPv6 standard. These should potentially be fixed up as 2460 goes to full standard: Points for full standard; • (non-)Processing of Type 0 routing he

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-08-02 Thread Mohacsi Janos
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] żŔĚŔĂŁşČ wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:28:57 +0900, Arifumi Matsumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Case2: ULA or Global Prioritization Case3: Multicast Source Address Selection For these cases, using a non default policy table could resolve

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-08-02 Thread Arifumi Matsumoto
Jinmei-san, thanks for your comments. Some replies below. > My fundamental question here is why such closed networks need global > IPv6 addresses (or even any IPv6 addresses) in the first place. > Whether it's a VPN site or a closed ASP, doesn't it suffice to simply > use private IPv4 addresses?

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-08-02 Thread Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/藤崎 智宏
Jinmei-san, | > Even if each of these ASPs uses ULA, address selection problem | > occurs once one of them has a peering with another site or | > once one of them acquires another ULA block. | | My fundamental question here is why such closed networks need global | IPv6 addresses (or even

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-08-02 Thread Stig Venaas
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:30:07PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: [...] > Even if I were to choose to use IPv6 for some reason, it seems I'd be > just happy with ULAs for such purposes, and then the (revised) default > address selection algorithm seems to suffice (and so we d

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-08-02 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:28:57 +0900, > Arifumi Matsumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> Case2: ULA or Global Prioritization >>> Case3: Multicast Source Address Selection >> >> For these cases, using a non default policy table could resolve the >> issue (and automatic policy distribution

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-07-28 Thread Arifumi Matsumoto
I'm co-author of this draft and web-page. Thank you for comments, Jinmei-san ,Stig. > I've read the latest draft, but I'm afraid the document itself doesn't > help assess whether the ipv6 wg can support that or not, since it > mainly concentrates on the DHCPv6 specific issues. > > I believe what s

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-07-27 Thread Pekka Savola
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] ¿ÀÌÀãºÈ wrote: Case2: ULA or Global Prioritization Case3: Multicast Source Address Selection For these cases, using a non default policy table could resolve the issue (and automatic policy distribution would help), but I personally think this

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-07-27 Thread Stig Venaas
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:00:00PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:01:10 +0900 (JST), > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > | Here is the first cut at an agenda for the IPv6 working group session at > > | the Paris IETF. Please review and s

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-07-27 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:01:10 +0900 (JST), > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > | Here is the first cut at an agenda for the IPv6 working group session at > | the Paris IETF. Please review and send us comments, deletions, and > additions. > Could you please give me a few minutes for followi

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-07-25 Thread Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35
Title: Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris Bob, I request the opportunity to present draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00 and draft-pashby-ipv6-detecting-spoofing-00. I will not be present but Karen O'Donoghue is willing to present it for me. I believe these are important issue

Re: Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-07-22 Thread fujisaki
Bob, | Here is the first cut at an agenda for the IPv6 working group session at | the Paris IETF. Please review and send us comments, deletions, and additions. Could you please give me a few minutes for following draft? Title: Distributing Default Address Selection Policy using DHCPv6

Proposed IPv6 W.G. Agenda for Paris

2005-07-22 Thread Bob Hinden
Here is the first cut at an agenda for the IPv6 working group session at the Paris IETF. Please review and send us comments, deletions, and additions. Thanks, Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman IPv6 Chairs Internet Protocol Version 6 WG (IPv6) Tuesday, August 2, 2005 1400-1600 Afternoon Session I --