Re: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-20 Thread Thomas Narten
Bob, The changes look good to me. One thing I noticed while reading this text (and this issue actually was in previous versions): +-+-+-+-+ flgs is a set of 4 flags: |0|R|P|T| +-+-+-+-+ The

Re: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-20 Thread Bob Hinden
Thomas, At 12:35 PM 05/20/2005, Thomas Narten wrote: Bob, The changes look good to me. Thanks! One thing I noticed while reading this text (and this issue actually was in previous versions): +-+-+-+-+ flgs is a set of 4 flags: |0|R|P|T|

Re: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-20 Thread Thomas Narten
How about if it just says: The high-order flag is reserved and must be zero. Actually, the issue that I'm trying to get around is to avoid having the spec say the flag must be xxx where xxx is any value. It should just (mostly) be ignored. If you say it must be zero, than some

Re: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-20 Thread Brian Haberman
On May 20, 2005, at 16:43, Thomas Narten wrote: How about if it just says: The high-order flag is reserved and must be zero. Actually, the issue that I'm trying to get around is to avoid having the spec say the flag must be xxx where xxx is any value. It should just (mostly) be ignored. If

RE: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-20 Thread Manfredi, Albert E
that flag. Other than that single item, I'm agreeing with Thomas. Bert -Original Message- From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:53 PM To: Thomas Narten Cc: Bob Hinden; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

Re: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-19 Thread Pekka Savola
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Bob Hinden wrote: The proposed changes in Section 2.7 on Multicast Addresses and Section 4.0 IANA Considerations can be found below. The changes are based on the issues raised by Thomas Narten and the IANA. I believe this will resolve the issues. You might want to add a

Re: Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-19 Thread Bob Hinden
Pekka, At 12:42 AM 05/19/2005, Pekka Savola wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005, Bob Hinden wrote: The proposed changes in Section 2.7 on Multicast Addresses and Section 4.0 IANA Considerations can be found below. The changes are based on the issues raised by Thomas Narten and the IANA. I believe this

Proposed changes to IPv6 Address Architecture draft

2005-05-18 Thread Bob Hinden
Hi, The proposed changes in Section 2.7 on Multicast Addresses and Section 4.0 IANA Considerations can be found below. The changes are based on the issues raised by Thomas Narten and the IANA. I believe this will resolve the issues. The complete document can be found at: