: "v6...@ietf.org WG" ; IETF IPv6 Mailing List
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Limiting the size of the IPv6 headerchain
(draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain)
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
Focus on the real operational requirement
On Jun 14, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 03:00 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> I've already mentioned this in one of the N (where is is becoming
>> distressingly large) threads on this
>
> Yeah, you would be one of those "more knowledgeable" folks I was referring
> to. :)
On 06/14/2013 03:00 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
I've already mentioned this in one of the N (where is is becoming distressingly
large) threads on this
Yeah, you would be one of those "more knowledgeable" folks I was
referring to. :)
--
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
> Focus on the real operational requirement (firewall functionality), then
> make sure that the constraint automatically tracks evolution in firewall
> functionality. Getting there leads to L4 in the first fragment, and
> anything
> else leads to
On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:56 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 01:39 AM, t.petch wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Doug Barton"
>> To:
>> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:23 PM
>>> On 06/13/2013 01:17 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> FWIW, I don't think anyone has proposed "if the ch
On 06/14/2013 02:19 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
While guidance is useful to establish a consistent-behavior baseline across
vendors and deployments, care must be taken to avoid the trap of precluding
innovation and evolution. Well-meaning limits based on current hardware
capabilities will become doctrin
Doug Barton wrote:
> >>...
> >> I agree with Randy, providing guidance on this topic will be very
> >> helpful, and BCP is the right category.
> >>
> >> As for what the number should be, if 256 is in the 80th percentile or
> >> higher of Warren's survey, that should be fine. A few vendors who are
>
On 06/14/2013 01:39 AM, t.petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Barton"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:23 PM
On 06/13/2013 01:17 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
FWIW, I don't think anyone has proposed "if the chain is larger
than X,
then drop".
i am saying that i am telling my
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Barton"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:23 PM
> On 06/13/2013 01:17 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> FWIW, I don't think anyone has proposed "if the chain is larger
than X,
> >> then drop".
> >
> > i am saying that i am telling my neighbor that, if the heade
