On 10/02/2013 08:50 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> Just a trivial change: "including" -> "subject to"
Agreed. But I can fix it this after IETF LC or even durng AUTH48.
Thanks!
Best regards,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25
Just a trivial change: "including" -> "subject to"
On 02/10/2013 1:14 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
Brian,
This works for me. So, the complete list of changes follows. Do these work for
you?
Ron
CHANGES
===
...
OLD>
A host that receives a first-fragme
header-chain@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: 6man WG
> Subject: Re: AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain
>
> Ron,
>
> On 10/2/13 1:14 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> > Brian,
> >
> > This works for me. So, the complete list of changes follows. Do these
&
Ron,
On 10/2/13 1:14 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> Brian,
>
> This works for me. So, the complete list of changes follows. Do these work
> for you?
>
Works for me!
Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I
f-6man-oversized-header-chain....@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: 6man WG
> Subject: Re: AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> On 10/2/13 12:23 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > So, merging in you last set of comments, th
Hi Ron,
On 10/2/13 12:23 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> So, merging in you last set of comments, the next draft version will include
> the changes listed below. Please tell me if these work for you.
>
> Ron
>
> OLD>
>For example, assume that a
[RFC 2460].
-Original Message-
> From: Brian Haberman [mailto:br...@innovationslab.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:23 AM
> To: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain....@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: 6man WG
> Subject: Re: AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain
&
Hi Ron,
On 10/2/13 10:55 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> Brian,
>
> Thanks for the review. Please see responses, inline.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Brian Haberman
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:16 PM
>> To: d
Brian,
Thanks for the review. Please see responses, inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Brian Haberman
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:16 PM
> To: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain@tools.ietf.org; 6man W
On 10/2/13 1:57 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Hi, Brian,
>
> On 10/01/2013 04:16 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> 1. The 2nd paragraph of Section 4 (Motivation) could be made more
>> clear. For example, you could indicate if the example first
>> fragment does or does not match the stateless firewall ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Brian,
On 10/01/2013 04:16 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> 1. The 2nd paragraph of Section 4 (Motivation) could be made more
> clear. For example, you could indicate if the example first
> fragment does or does not match the stateless firewall rule.
11 matches
Mail list logo
