Re: AfriNIC, ULA-C, & "why not just get PI space"

2007-07-03 Thread Alain Patrick AINA
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 18:53:45 -0700, bill fumerola wrote > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:17:45PM +, Alain Patrick AINA wrote: > > > those in the AfriNIC region who want globally unique, registered space > > > but do not plan to "announce the IPv6 PI address space" have no method > > > of getting any

Re: AfriNIC, ULA-C, & "why not just get PI space"

2007-07-02 Thread bill fumerola
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:17:45PM +, Alain Patrick AINA wrote: > > those in the AfriNIC region who want globally unique, registered space > > but do not plan to "announce the IPv6 PI address space" have no method > > of getting any such space. if anyone reads this differently than i do, > > pl

Re: AfriNIC, ULA-C, & "why not just get PI space"

2007-07-02 Thread Alain Patrick AINA
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 08:48:14 pm bill fumerola wrote: > AfriNIC has implemented a PIv6 space policy[0]. part of it states: > > "* The 'end-site' must show a plan to use and announce the IPv6 provider > independent address space within twelve (12) months. After that period, > if not announced,

RE: AfriNIC, ULA-C, & "why not just get PI space"

2007-07-01 Thread michael.dillon
> those in the AfriNIC region who want globally unique, > registered space but do not plan to "announce the IPv6 PI > address space" have no method of getting any such space. if > anyone reads this differently than i do, please educate me. Do the RIRs actually refuse to allocate addresses to o