Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-12-26 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Brian, On 12/25/2012 01:21 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a >>> lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the >>> first place. >> >> I suggest that you add a discussion of site renumbering considerati

Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-12-25 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 18/12/2012 08:06, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 18/12/2012 02:01, Fernando Gont wrote: > ... >> Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a >> lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the >> first place. > > I suggest that you add a discussion

Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-12-18 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Brian, On 12/18/2012 05:06 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 18/12/2012 02:01, Fernando Gont wrote: > ... >> Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a >> lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the >> first place. > > I suggest that you ad

Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-12-18 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 18/12/2012 02:01, Fernando Gont wrote: ... > Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a > lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the > first place. I suggest that you add a discussion of site renumbering considerations. The problems describe

Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-12-17 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Hosnieh, On 12/17/2012 08:25 PM, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote: >> To clarify my question from my last email, I raise three important >> issues here: >> >> 1 - The assumption made in this draft is not true because, >> according > >>> What's the "assumption" you're referring to? > - One of your assu

RE: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-12-17 Thread Rafiee, Hosnieh
Thank you for your response, please find my reply below -Original Message- From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fg...@si6networks.com] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:32 PM To: Rafiee, Hosnieh Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; bob.hin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call: Hi, Hosnieh, Thanks so

Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2012-12-17 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Hosnieh, Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my comments inline... On 12/17/2012 12:18 PM, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote: > Follow-up > > To clarify my question from my last email, I raise three important > issues here: > > 1 - The assumption made in this draft is not true because, accor