Hi, Brian,
On 12/25/2012 01:21 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a
>>> lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the
>>> first place.
>>
>> I suggest that you add a discussion of site renumbering considerati
On 18/12/2012 08:06, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 18/12/2012 02:01, Fernando Gont wrote:
> ...
>> Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a
>> lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the
>> first place.
>
> I suggest that you add a discussion
Hi, Brian,
On 12/18/2012 05:06 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 18/12/2012 02:01, Fernando Gont wrote:
> ...
>> Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a
>> lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the
>> first place.
>
> I suggest that you ad
On 18/12/2012 02:01, Fernando Gont wrote:
...
> Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a
> lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the
> first place.
I suggest that you add a discussion of site renumbering considerations.
The problems describe
Hi, Hosnieh,
On 12/17/2012 08:25 PM, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote:
>> To clarify my question from my last email, I raise three important
>> issues here:
>>
>> 1 - The assumption made in this draft is not true because,
>> according
>
>>> What's the "assumption" you're referring to?
> - One of your assu
Thank you for your response, please find my reply below
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fg...@si6networks.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:32 PM
To: Rafiee, Hosnieh
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; bob.hin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: FW: 6MAN WG Last Call:
Hi, Hosnieh,
Thanks so
Hi, Hosnieh,
Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my comments inline...
On 12/17/2012 12:18 PM, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote:
> Follow-up
>
> To clarify my question from my last email, I raise three important
> issues here:
>
> 1 - The assumption made in this draft is not true because, accor