Re: Fragmented IPv6 packets

2005-12-16 Thread Elwyn Davies
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: quinta-feira, 15 de Dezembro de 2005 19:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one that applies the frag

RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets

2005-12-16 Thread Nuno Garcia
: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one that applies the fragmentation). The receiving side may reassemble these packets. From at least one implementation (Open BSD) there is no such check. Also the TAHI test doesn't test for this

RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets

2005-12-15 Thread sasson_shuki
The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one that applies the fragmentation). The receiving side may reassemble these packets. From at least one implementation (Open BSD) there is no such check. Also the TAHI test doesn't test for this case. All of the above and the comm

RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets

2005-12-08 Thread Vishwas Manral
Hi Muthu, You may want to shift the discussion to the v6ops list instead. Have a look at the draft http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-manral-v6ops-tiny-fragments-is sues-00.txt in the meanwhile. Thanks, Vishwas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O