> Mark,
>
>
> >"Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6 and
> >DNAME Resource Records [RFC-3363]."
> >
> > I object to recommending that DNAME's not be supported. RFC
> > 3363 does NOT say that. It says that they shouldn't be use
> > in the reverse t
> > Just don't mention DNAME at all. Note DNAME support will
> > be manditory with DNSSEC so the only issue is whether we
> > discourage the use under IP6.ARPA which I (and lots of others
> > in dnsext) now believe we got wrong.
> >
> >"Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to su
Hi Mark,
> > "Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6
> > Resource Records [RFC-3363]. Usage of DNAME Reseource Records in
> > the reverse tree is deprecated."
> >
> > John
>
> Just don't mention DNAME at all. Note DNAME support will
> be mandi
Mark,
>"Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6 and
>DNAME Resource Records [RFC-3363]."
>
> I object to recommending that DNAME's not be supported. RFC
> 3363 does NOT say that. It says that they shouldn't be use
> in the reverse tree for RENUM
"Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6 and
DNAME Resource Records [RFC-3363]."
I object to recommending that DNAME's not be supported. RFC
3363 does NOT say that. It says that they shouldn't be use
in the reverse tree for RENUMBERING purpo
