RE: IANA considerations in rfc2461bis

2005-08-12 Thread Soliman, Hesham
All done, except: define the policy for the Neighbour Discovery options (since this hasn't previously been properly defined). = Did you mean the policy of allocating new option numbers? - it should probably explicitly define the ICMP types and ND options which are being continued

Re: IANA considerations in rfc2461bis

2005-08-12 Thread Elwyn Davies
Soliman, Hesham wrote: All done, except: define the policy for the Neighbour Discovery options (since this hasn't previously been properly defined). = Did you mean the policy of allocating new option numbers? Yes. I don't think this is covered elsewhere and there was no explicit

RE: IANA considerations in rfc2461bis

2005-08-12 Thread Soliman, Hesham
= I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. What do you mean by don't have an explicit registration in RFC2461.? The IANA considerations section in RFC2461 was very skimpy and didn't explicitly say what new ICMPv6 message types were being added or what the set of ND