Not going to comment on the proposed protocol change itself yet, but this draft
is missing something that I think is fundamentally gating to it moving forward –
To provide a support for
multiple hash *algorithms, a method of reusing the security parameter
bits in the address is
the problems it solves:
The draft provides a simple method of encoding multiple hash
function types in a CGA address, it can be thought of as
an improvement or an update to RFC4982.
the motivation:
RFC3972 defined CGA (cryptographically generated address) but only
use one
