RE: RE: RE: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-04-08 Thread Christian Huitema
> But I don't agree with you in "each trial is just as complex as finding a > matching CGA address." It is just as complex -- unless of course someone cracks the hash algorithm. Absent a published crack, we have to assume that the best method for the attacker is an exhaustive search of salt va

答复: RE: RE: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-04-08 Thread zhou . sujing
> To: Christian Huitema > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; Jari Arkko > Subject: 答复: RE: about security level evaluation of draft- > zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00 > > > Regards~~~ > > -Sujing Zhou > > Christian Huitema 写于 2012-03-27 23:00:09: > > > > Well, I think it

RE: RE: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-03-28 Thread Christian Huitema
Subject: 答复: RE: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00 Regards~~~ -Sujing Zhou Christian Huitema mailto:huit...@microsoft.com>> 写于 2012-03-27 23:00:09: > > Well, I think it is quite a simple trade-off. Increasing Sec > increases computational effort on both

答复: RE: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-03-28 Thread zhou . sujing
Regards~~~ -Sujing Zhou Christian Huitema 写于 2012-03-27 23:00:09: > > Well, I think it is quite a simple trade-off. Increasing Sec > increases computational effort on both sides by equal amount. > Increasing the length of > > the hash increases computational effort only on the attacker side.

Re: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-03-27 Thread Jari Arkko
Christian, Well, I think it is quite a simple trade-off. Increasing Sec increases computational effort on both sides by equal amount. Increasing the length of the hash increases computational effort only on the attacker side. As a result, the hash bits are relatively valuable. Jari, the effec

RE: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-03-27 Thread Christian Huitema
> Well, I think it is quite a simple trade-off. Increasing Sec increases > computational effort on both sides by equal amount. Increasing the length of > the hash increases computational effort only on the attacker side. As a > result, the hash bits are relatively valuable. Jari, the effect of

答复: Re: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-03-27 Thread zhou . sujing
Regards~~~ -Sujing Zhou Jari Arkko 写于 2012-03-27 16:21:52: > Well, I think it is quite a simple trade-off. Increasing Sec > increases computational effort on both sides by equal amount. > Increasing the length of the hash increases computational effort > only on the attacker side. As a resul

Re: about security level evaluation of draft-zhou-6man-mhash-cga-00

2012-03-27 Thread Jari Arkko
Well, I think it is quite a simple trade-off. Increasing Sec increases computational effort on both sides by equal amount. Increasing the length of the hash increases computational effort only on the attacker side. As a result, the hash bits are relatively valuable. The trade-off that we have