-Original Message-
From: Andrew Yourtchenko [mailto:ayour...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:36 AM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: Samita Chakrabarti; nordm...@cisco.com; pthub...@cisco.com;
m...@lilacglade.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd review
Hi
...@lilacglade.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd review
Hi Andrew,
On 08/05/2013 06:51 AM, ayourtch wrote:
> The RS sending mechanism will be resilient, I assume, such that the
> node does get RA even in a high-loss environments, right ? Maybe
>
Hi ,
Thanks for your detailed comments. Apology for the late reply .
It'd be nice to know your name - so we could address you directly.
Please see the responses in-line.
-Original Message-
From: ayourtch [mailto:ayour...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 3:52 AM
To: Samita Chakr
Hi Suresh,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 08/05/2013 06:51 AM, ayourtch wrote:
The RS sending mechanism will be resilient, I assume, such that the node
does get RA even in a high-loss environments, right ? Maybe useful to
include a paragraph or two on the unreliabi
Hi Andrew,
On 08/05/2013 06:51 AM, ayourtch wrote:
> The RS sending mechanism will be resilient, I assume, such that the node
> does get RA even in a high-loss environments, right ? Maybe useful to
> include a paragraph or two on the unreliability of this mechanism. I
> think Suresh said he had s
