RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-02-02 Thread Dave Thaler
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] == OLD: 8.2 Security Protocols ESP [RFC-2406] MUST be supported. AH [RFC-2402] MUST be supported. RFC-2406 and RFC 2402 are being updated by the IPsec Working

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-16 Thread Dave Thaler
@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt Hi all, I propose to update the Node Requirements to handle these: RFC2401 is now obsoleted by RFC4301 RFC2402 is now obsoleted by RFC4302 RFC2404 is now obsoleted by RFC4305 RFC2406 is now obsoleted by RFC4303

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-09 Thread john . loughney
Vishwas, I see a few more inconsistencies regarding the same RFC: Since ESP encryption and authentication are both optional, support for the NULL encryption algorithm [RFC-2410] and the NULL authentication algorithm [RFC-2406] MUST be provided to maintain consistency with the way

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-09 Thread Vishwas Manral
vulnerability found)? Thanks, Vishwas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 1:48 PM To: Vishwas Manral; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-09 Thread john . loughney
Hi all, I propose to update the Node Requirements to handle these: RFC2401 is now obsoleted by RFC4301 RFC2402 is now obsoleted by RFC4302 RFC2404 is now obsoleted by RFC4305 RFC2406 is now obsoleted by RFC4303, RFC4305 RFC2407,2408,2409 are now obsoleted by RFC4306 Changes are: AH

Re: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-06 Thread Jari Arkko
They should be updated. By the way I noticed recently that the RFC Editor does not necessarily do obsoleted by updates to references automatically. This stuff needs to be done by the authors in AUTH48. And in this particular case we have even text changes, as you point out. By the way, there are

Re: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-06 Thread Pekka Savola
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Jari Arkko wrote: By the way, there are also substantive changes in the new IPsec documents. For instance, AH support is no longer a MUST. I think this should be reflected in the node requirements document too, as that currently says AH [RFC-2402] MUST be supported.. There's

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-06 Thread Dave Thaler
Here's another one: RFC2893 is now obsoleted by RFC4213 Section 6.l.1 says: RFC 2893 is currently being updated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Thaler Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt

2006-01-06 Thread john . loughney
/Helsinki) Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-11.txt Here's another one: RFC2893 is now obsoleted by RFC4213 Section 6.l.1 says: RFC 2893 is currently being updated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave