On 2011-02-04 14:31, Thomas Narten wrote:
> I'm not an RSVP expert, but I wonder if the wording at issue comes
> from the notion that (in some cases) the receiver is the one that
> actually initates flow setup (in the reverse direction) and wants to
> tell the routers what Flow Labels the source is
I'm not an RSVP expert, but I wonder if the wording at issue comes
from the notion that (in some cases) the receiver is the one that
actually initates flow setup (in the reverse direction) and wants to
tell the routers what Flow Labels the source is using. The source is
labeling the packets, but is
> ISSUE 4. The Introduction previously included:
>
>Doing this [setting the flow label]
>enables load spreading and receiver oriented resource allocation, for
>example.
>
> The phrase "receiver oriented resource allocation" has been deleted because
> we don't know what it means.
>
