Hi Chad,
On 10-12-17 03:02 PM, Chad Kissinger wrote:
Hello,
We are deploying IPV6 to our customers and are carefully planning the
architecture of how we are going to deploy prefixes, assign customer
gateways and how we are going to number our own infrastructure in a
meaningful way. Al
Chad,
Why would you want a specific range? To reduce the (small)
risk from scanning attacks, a unique pseudo-random choice would be
better, IMHO, as long as it conforms to RFC 4291 and 5453.
BTW this question might fit better on the v6ops list or even
on ipv6-...@lists.cluenet.de where there are
Hello,
We are deploying IPV6 to our customers and are carefully planning the
architecture of how we are going to deploy prefixes, assign customer gateways
and how we are going to number our own infrastructure in a meaningful way.
Although I think Stateless Autoconfiguration will be used quite
