: ROLL choice to not use the Flow Label
Thanks for all the enlightment about ROLL.
My personal conclusion is that the ROLL considerations are too complex
and
too subtle to be compatible with using a general-purpose IPv6 header
field (i.e.
the flow label) for ROLL purposes. They seem
Pascal == Pascal Thubert (pthubert) pthub...@cisco.com writes:
Pascal Hi Brian:
Pascal The Hop by Hop is certainly the clean solution.
Pascal The trouble is that it requires additional bytes in every
Pascal packet for the header and for the IP-in-IP encapsulation
Pascal
On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Thanks for all the enlightment about ROLL.
My personal conclusion is that the ROLL considerations
are too complex and too subtle to be compatible with using
a general-purpose IPv6 header field (i.e. the flow label)
for ROLL purposes.
Thanks for all the enlightment about ROLL.
My personal conclusion is that the ROLL considerations
are too complex and too subtle to be compatible with using
a general-purpose IPv6 header field (i.e. the flow label)
for ROLL purposes. They seem to be an extreme case of the
challenges of defining a
