6 WG
> Subject: Sending ICMP error upon receiving an NA without
> SLLAO in 2461bis
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a mini concensus call on the discussion I had with
> Jinmei below.
>
> The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to
> send an ICM
According to RFC 2492 SLLAO option should not be used
in an ATM PVC environment, yet the NA may be
transmitted as a part of DAD which is still required.
Thus with this proposal we can have an ICMP error
generated in a scenario where no error condition has
occurred.
--- Thomas Narten wrote:
> > T
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:59:46 -0500,
> Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to send an ICMP error
>> due to the reception of an NA without the SLLAO. The reason for sending the
>> ICMP error is to inform upper layers that the
> > The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to
> send an ICMP error
> > due to the reception of an NA without the SLLAO. The
> reason for sending the
> > ICMP error is to inform upper layers that the communication has
> > failed.
>
> It took me a while to figure out wha
> The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to send an ICMP error
> due to the reception of an NA without the SLLAO. The reason for sending the
> ICMP error is to inform upper layers that the communication has
> failed.
It took me a while to figure out what you are proposing. To summ
Hi all,
This is a mini concensus call on the discussion I had with Jinmei below.
The basic issue left is whether we should allow a node to send an ICMP error
due to the reception of an NA without the SLLAO. The reason for sending the
ICMP error is to inform upper layers that the communication
