Re: [dhcwg] RE: Where do we do this work: purpose of m/o bit

On May 27, 2005, at 11:55 AM, Bound, Jim wrote: If others want the cross posting that is fine I just asked the question and would like to hear what people think that is all. Seems like part of what's going on is that we needed to have this discussion cross-posted a year or three ago, so it'

RE: Where do we do this work: purpose of m/o bit

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Droms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 2:51 PM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Where do we do this work: purpose of m/o bit > > Jim - it would be great to sort this out in o

Re: Where do we do this work: purpose of m/o bit

Jim - it would be great to sort this out in one group or the other. But I think the eventual solution will require input from both ipv6 and dhc WGs, so we might have to continue the cross-posting or set up a short- lived mailing list just for this discussion. - Ralph On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 14:40

Where do we do this work: purpose of m/o bit

Do we need to continue cross posting and we should decide where we sort this out IPv6 or DHC. My suggestion is the bits need to be understood for ND and Addrconf thus lets get this done in the IPv6 WG. That would make job of what DHC has to do easy. /jim --