JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:49:47 +0100,
> > Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> textual representation
> >> 2.2 (1) has to state how many digits are permitted as "x"
> >> (one component between colon). my personal prefer
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:49:47 +0100,
> Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> textual representation
>> 2.2 (1) has to state how many digits are permitted as "x"
>> (one component between colon). my personal preference is that
>> "x" has to be 1 to 4 digits (5 digits or more is
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:27 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt
> >
> >
> >
ROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt
>
>
> > as an IAB i was asked to comment on
> draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt,
> > so here it is. happy holidays.
>
> one more ;-)
>
> itojun
>
>
> MINOR
> ==
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt
>
>
> as an IAB i was ask
> IPv4 mapped address
> if I remember correctly draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-02.txt
> (IPv4 mapped address on-wire is harmful) got enough consensus. please
> document that IPv4 mapped address is not permitted on wire, in 2.5.5.
That would seem inconsistent with the SIIT R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> textual representation
> 2.2 (1) has to state how many digits are permitted as "x"
> (one component between colon). my personal preference is that
> "x" has to be 1 to 4 digits (5 digits or more is invalid).
I think an informative reference t
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:13:16 -0800,
> Fred Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Last I heard, Steve Deering had gone walkabout - but
> surely, he must have a new e-mail address by now?
Perhaps the best way is that someone who can contact Steve personally
asks him explicitly, but jus FYI
Last I heard, Steve Deering had gone walkabout - but
surely, he must have a new e-mail address by now?
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
as an IAB i was asked to comment on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt,
so here it is. happy holidays.
one more ;-)
itojun
MINOR
> as an IAB i was asked to comment on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt,
> so here it is. happy holidays.
one more ;-)
itojun
MINOR
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is no longer valid, so you may want to remove it
from the draft.
--
as an IAB i was asked to comment on draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-00.txt,
so here it is. happy holidays.
itojun
MAJOR
=
"scope"
the use of word/concept "scope" needs more care. moreover the
terminology is not consistent (such as "link-scope" and "local scope"
11 matches
Mail list logo
