At Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:07:52 +0200 (EET),
Pekka Savola pek...@netcore.fi wrote:
I'm afraid has not been implemented is too strong. In fact, we have
implemented it in the KAME/BSD IPv6 stack in that we implemented
special restrictions (at that time) on anycast addresses and had
-
From: Fred Baker [mailto:f...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:54 AM
To: Miya Kohno
Cc: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉; Becca Nitzan; ra...@psg.com;
m...@iij.ad.jp; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: comments on draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
A note you may find interesting
I've read this draft. I don't have a strong opinion on the proposal
per se, but have a couple of minor comments:
1. In Section 4, the draft says:
However, Subnet-router
anycast address has not been implemented and in practice, this has
not been a problem.
I'm afraid has not been
...@isc.org]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:37 PM
To: Miya Kohno; Becca Nitzan; ra...@psg.com; m...@iij.ad.jp
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: comments on draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
(resending as I seem to have submitted the original one from the
wrong
address)
I've read this draft. I
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
I'm afraid has not been implemented is too strong. In fact, we have
implemented it in the KAME/BSD IPv6 stack in that we implemented
special restrictions (at that time) on anycast addresses and had
experimentally assigned subnet-router anycast
(resending as I seem to have submitted the original one from the wrong
address)
I've read this draft. I don't have a strong opinion on the proposal
per se, but have a couple of minor comments:
1. In Section 4, the draft says:
However, Subnet-router
anycast address has not been
Nitzan; ra...@psg.com; m...@iij.ad.jp
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: comments on draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
(resending as I seem to have submitted the original one from the wrong
address)
I've read this draft. I don't have a strong opinion on the
proposal per se, but have a couple
