On 13 nov 2007, at 13:46, James Carlson wrote:
Matter of fact, it seems to address something that also occurs with
IPv4, with multihomed hosts. And that apparently, some OSs screw up
royally.
I don't agree that those OSes screw up royally. They are, in fact,
doing what their users *tell*
Iljitsch van Beijnum writes:
On 13 nov 2007, at 13:46, James Carlson wrote:
works. (Such as the shim6 REAP protocol is designed to do although
REAP doesn't know about routes.) So it should clearly be possible to
send packets that don't conform to the source address / route
alignment.
Hi Albert,
El 12/11/2007, a las 19:28, Manfredi, Albert E escribió:
I found nothing objectionable at all in the draft.
Matter of fact, it seems to address something that also occurs with
IPv4, with multihomed hosts. And that apparently, some OSs screw up
royally. Which is, if a multi-homed
Manfredi, Albert E writes:
Matter of fact, it seems to address something that also occurs with
IPv4, with multihomed hosts. And that apparently, some OSs screw up
royally. Which is, if a multi-homed IPv4 host, connected to two
different IP subnets, transmits an IP packet over Subnet A, it
-Original Message-
From: James Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree that those OSes screw up royally. They are, in fact,
doing what their users *tell* them to do.
If an application binds the source address on Subnet B and then sends
a packet with a destination address
Manfredi, Albert E writes:
-Original Message-
From: James Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree that those OSes screw up royally. They are, in fact,
doing what their users *tell* them to do.
If an application binds the source address on Subnet B and then sends
AFAIU, you are essentially proposing to perform source address
based routing by the hosts and by the routers in a multiprefix
site, is that correct?
I don't like the term, because I first do a destination lookup and
only look up the source address in certain cases. Kind of like the
Hi Havard,
El 12/11/2007, a las 17:27, Havard Eidnes escribió:
AFAIU, you are essentially proposing to perform source address
based routing by the hosts and by the routers in a multiprefix
site, is that correct?
I don't like the term, because I first do a destination lookup and
only look up
-Original Message-
From: Fred Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 8:40 AM
To: marcelo bagnulo braun
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List
Subject: Re:
draft-baker-6man-multiprefix-default-route-00.txt is a newdraft
On Nov 12, 2007, at 12:27 PM, marcelo bagnulo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 12, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Instead, my inclination would be to solve this problem in a much
simpler manner, simply by declaring it a configuration error. A
site which receives prefixes from more than a single provider is
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Instead, my inclination would be to solve this problem in a
much simpler manner, simply by declaring it a configuration
error. A site which receives prefixes from more than a single
provider is clearly multihomed, and needs to have its providers
make
11 matches
Mail list logo
