Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:33:59 -0400
>From: Victor Kuarsingh
>To: Brian E Carpenter , Joel jaeggli
>
>Cc: 6man
>Subject: Re: draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain-00
>Message-ID:
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
>
>On 12-04
On 12-04-08 3:10 AM, "Brian E Carpenter"
wrote:
>On 2012-04-07 17:17, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> I hesitate to suggest this because I'll probably turn into a pillar of
>> salt at some point for harping on it. however...
>
>Just don't look back (towards IPv4).
>
>>
>> Getting new extension headers
On 4/8/12 00:10 , Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2012-04-07 17:17, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> I hesitate to suggest this because I'll probably turn into a pillar of
>> salt at some point for harping on it. however...
>
> Just don't look back (towards IPv4).
>
>>
>> Getting new extension headers genera
On 2012-04-07 17:17, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> I hesitate to suggest this because I'll probably turn into a pillar of
> salt at some point for harping on it. however...
Just don't look back (towards IPv4).
>
> Getting new extension headers generally parsed is a high bar to get
> over.
I have anoth
I hesitate to suggest this because I'll probably turn into a pillar of
salt at some point for harping on it. however...
Getting new extension headers generally parsed is a high bar to get
over. That said within one domain of control you might be able to fit a
subset of the information you're looki
>
> Hello Tyson
>
>
>
> Indeed a very good and interesting work!!
>
>
>
> I would like to suggest a few issues for you and the WG to consider:
>
>
>
> 1. In chapter 5 you proposed the PSDO structure. I think you must
> consider the addition of Stain structure and semantics to be part of the
> -Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Martin, Steve
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:23 PM
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain-00 High Level Questions
>
> Hi Tyson,
> I&#
On 2012-02-17 10:23, Martin, Steve wrote:
...
> So, and this is where you paper is relevant, I have been pondering how IPv6
> can be deployed to these subscribers with the added benefit of the "built-in"
> security that they have been used to with the likes of NAT.
This was the subject matter of
Hi Tyson,
I've just read your ITEF paper on Packet Staining, a very interesting idea and
relevant to an area of research that I'm looking at.
Something that I've been considering is how might IPv6 impact individuals, i.e.
home users who typically have limited internet security. Under IPv4 NAT h
and
reputation intelligence into IPv6 headers as destination options.
A new version of I-D, draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain-00.txt has
been successfully submitted by Tyson Macaulay and posted to the IETF
repository.
Filename:draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain
Revision:00
Title:
Please note this new draft related to embedding cyber security and reputation
intelligence into IPv6 headers as destination options.
A new version of I-D, draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain-00.txt has been
successfully submitted by Tyson Macaulay and posted to the IETF repository.
Filename
11 matches
Mail list logo
