Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Idr] redistributing isis v6 routes into BGP
Hello all,
I have a question regarding redistribution of IPv6 ISIS routes into BGP.
The v6 routes of ISIS have link local next hops. So, when these are
redistributed into I-BGP( without route maps
On 2005-Apr-22, at 2:15 PM, Harisreeprasad Gowda wrote:
I think it should be the global address of the interface over which
the IBGP
peering is established.
IBGP sessions are usually plumbed between loopback interfaces, not
physical interfaces. So, most of the time, your suggestion and
Brian'
It is strongly recommended in this environment that the use of a
"loopback" interface be coded as the nexthop address. Also of concern
is auto-summarization.
Otherwise, from my experience if this is an originating BGP announcement
from an iBGP peer only. If there is only 1 other peer, it will u
Hello all,
I have a question regarding redistribution of IPv6 ISIS routes into BGP.
The v6 routes of ISIS have link local next hops. So, when these are
redistributed into I-BGP( without route maps having next hop set clause),
what should be the value of global next hop v6 address to be sent in th
