Re: the two other drafts similar to raoptions draft (Was: 6man IETF85 Call for agenda items)

2012-11-28 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Le 10/11/2012 15:09, Romain KUNTZ a écrit : Hello Alexandru, From what I understand, draft-sarikaya is for hosts only while draft-jhee and draft-petrescu are for routers. I'd have a question regarding exchanging MNP reachability between routers: wouldn't it be the job of a routing protocol in

Re: the two other drafts similar to raoptions draft (Was: 6man IETF85 Call for agenda items)

2012-11-10 Thread Romain KUNTZ
Hello Alexandru, >From what I understand, draft-sarikaya is for hosts only while draft-jhee and >draft-petrescu are for routers. I'd have a question regarding exchanging MNP reachability between routers: wouldn't it be the job of a routing protocol instead? Any reasons why extending ND instea

Re: the two other drafts similar to raoptions draft (Was: 6man IETF85 Call for agenda items)

2012-11-05 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
HEllo Behcet, I pick on this email to reply. You presented today draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-01 in 6man. There are these other two drafts which do practically the same thing: route exchange using ND. draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp-00.txt draft-petrescu-autoconf-ra-based-routing-02.txt These latte