[IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Mike Hawkins
I'm playing with radio station history again and I'm doing battle with myself about how to document station swaps. I'll give two examples. Example #1: A few years back, KLOC/920/Ceres CA format moved to KVIN/1390/Turlock CA, and the KVIN format moved over to KLOC. The call letters swapped with

[IRCA] Tone tester on 1540

2011-01-18 Thread amdxer
At 04:15am CST someone is running a tone test.  Steady tone, occasional shifting frequency up/down, occasionally on/off.   Loop bearing nw/se under KXEL. Tom Jasinski Joliet, IL ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com

[IRCA] wierd tones on 1520 and 1540

2011-01-18 Thread amdxer
Am hearing wierd tones on both 1520 USB and 1540 LSB.  Could this be generated by someone on 1530khz.   Tom Jasinski Joliet, IL ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Mike Sanburn
As for myself, I counted both KERN and KERI as new loggings at their new dial positions. I'll always think of KERN as being 1410 since they were there forever it seems. There have been so many two-way and even three-way frequency swaps in recent years that one cannot always keep track. I'll

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Russ Edmunds
To me these are call changes. I note them in my logs, ( and would do so again should they change again down the road ) but I don't count them in my totals. I know that others do things differently, but many do it this way also. At one time, I counted call changes, however I realized that as the

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread sa...@sounddsl.com
My approach is, I guess, to log the actual stick in the ground (the tower/antenna) on a given frequency. If the same antenna switches frequency, then for me it would be a new station. However, I treat call sign changes about the same way I would treat format changes, and note them as sorta

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Scott Fybush
Mike Hawkins wrote: I'm playing with radio station history again and I'm doing battle with myself about how to document station swaps. I'll give two examples. Example #1: A few years back, KLOC/920/Ceres CA format moved to KVIN/1390/Turlock CA, and the KVIN format moved over to KLOC. The

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread James Niven
For me, if the station changes frequency or city of license, then I count as a new station. As for Call letter or format changes I do re-log the station but it does not add to my totals since there is no change at the transmitter site. This is my 2 cents worth. James Niven Cedar Creek,

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Russ Johnson
I like that Facility ID number as the identifier. Hmmany way to get that incorporated into the AM Log? On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Scott Fybush sc...@fybush.com wrote: Mike Hawkins wrote: I'm playing with radio station history again and I'm doing battle with myself about how to

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS
Same principle here as in Kevin's first paragraph but unless it moves more than ~25-30 miles, I do not count local location / facilities changes on the same frequency. If a 250 watter in Iowa went to 10 Kw (or vice versa) on the same channel, I do not count it as new. I do count frequency

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Mike Hawkins
Scott, I used your reply as a reference here because it addresses two things. First is that FCC's website has so little information on it that is accessible outside the FCC that its rather useless. Tracking applications always results in major change, minor change, STA or license. I have not

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Scott Fybush
Mike Hawkins wrote: I used your reply as a reference here because it addresses two things. First is that FCC's website has so little information on it that is accessible outside the FCC that its rather useless. Tracking applications always results in major change, minor change, STA or license.

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Mike Hawkins
Scott, Thank you for this. I'm at work right now, so I have to remember my priorities, but I will try a few examples on the FCC site tonight when I have time. I have tracked almost all of the AM stations that have existed in US and Canada (its well over 20,000 entries), keeping track of changes

[IRCA] WWV Solar Report

2011-01-18 Thread Ng1u
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt :Issued: 2011 Jan 18 2105 UTC # Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center # # Geophysical Alert Message # Solar-terrestrial indices for 18 January follow. Solar flux 81 and estimated mid-latitude A-Index 4. The

Re: [IRCA] Opinions requested on documenting station swaps

2011-01-18 Thread Russ Edmunds
Since you've raised a new question, I'll respond. I don't count power/pattern changes. Mostly this is so because there's no easy way to identify them all, and good way to design criteria to be reasonable. If a semi-local goes from semi-regular to pest status, so what ? If a local changes and I

[IRCA] Leo Meyerson, W0GFQ, turns 100

2011-01-18 Thread Bob Coomler
This is from another list, but I know there are a number of, ahem, we radio veterans here.  If you are not a ham, I'm sure a local post card would be equally appreciated.   Bob Coomler Tucson, AZ     Hi  Everybody, On Feb 24th QCWA Chapter 154 in West Palm Springs is celebrating Leo's

[IRCA] WWV Solar Report

2011-01-18 Thread Ng1u
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt :Issued: 2011 Jan 19 0005 UTC # Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center # # Geophysical Alert Message # Solar-terrestrial indices for 18 January follow. Solar flux 81 and mid-latitude A-index 4. The