"everything about HD is a lie."
- non-DX'er, 'civilian' poster on consumer info board.
z
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
___
IR
--- Pete Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate to be dense but everyone else seems to call
> it IBOC (for "on
> channel") so what's the "AC" - at channel?
Because it has never been and NEVER WILL be "on
channel" a lie started and perpetuated by the
inventors. The digital will ONLY be
> > BTW, why is "Canada" mentioned in the subject line? So far, we remain
> > IBAC-free here, 'cept for the stuff that slops over from south of
> > the border.
I think the George Bush GOP is trying to blame Canada for
IBOC... kinda a form 'a terrorism or some'in..
In other news, while on the W
ssage -
From: "Joe Miller, AB8YP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America"
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Canada IBAC
>I believe "ac" is for "adjacent channel". No fear,
>
I believe "ac" is for "adjacent channel". No fear,
someone will correct me if I am wrong
VY73 from Joe AB8YP
--- Pete Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barry,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > BTW, why is "Canada" mentioned in the subject
> line? So far, we remain
> > IBAC-free here, 'cept for the
Club of
>America
>Subject: [IRCA] Canada IBAC
>Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:40:56 -0700
>
>Barry,
>
>You wrote:
>
> > BTW, why is "Canada" mentioned in the subject line? So far, we remain
> > IBAC-free here, 'cept for the stuff that slops over from sout
Barry,
You wrote:
> BTW, why is "Canada" mentioned in the subject line? So far, we remain
> IBAC-free here, 'cept for the stuff that slops over from south of
> the border.
I hate to be dense but everyone else seems to call it IBOC (for "on
channel") so what's the "AC" - at channel?
Pete Ta
