At 08:59 AM 4/17/2007 -0600, you wrote:
>Charles A Taylor wrote:
>
> > That said, it could be done, especially if it makes for good community
> > relations.
>
>Indeed.
>
>My local graveryarder, KRSN 1490 Los Alamos, has its transmitter and
>tower on National Laboratory property, which is owned by t
In the case of our military bases in the area, one is state owned, Camp
Rilea (a mile away). It looks federal gov., but the state owns it.
INfact in looking in the phone book, the PX and all are listed under US
gov, rather than the state. The Feds use it. Infact about all branches
of the military
Charles A Taylor wrote:
> That said, it could be done, especially if it makes for good community
> relations.
Indeed.
My local graveryarder, KRSN 1490 Los Alamos, has its transmitter and
tower on National Laboratory property, which is owned by the U.S.
Department of Energy. The Lab found room
At 09:55 PM 4/16/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>As long as the tower isn't on the base/military property, they can license
>to Camp Lejune, Camp Pendleton or whatever all they want and the Military
>can't do diddly squat
>
>Paul
>
Paul,
A-HA! Anti military are we?
Now don't everyone flame me: I'm just
If KOOD 1480 asks for an FCC license to change it's "COL" City of Licence from
Stielicoom, Washington to Fort Lewis, Washington --- it is under FCC rules.
Not the US Army. Section 307(B) is an FCC rule. 1480 could still be licensed
to "Fort Lewis" and not located on the base.Most of the
If the VOA transmitter site is on"private property" it is NOT owned or
controlled by VOA alone. It may be possible to "sub-lease" or lease directly
from the private land owner. NOT all "government" installations are on
Federal Property. It all depends on who owns the property.
___
Yes -- and NO. Not all Military Bases are owned by the Feds. 1480 in
Steilicoom, Washington could "rent" a parcel of land on the Fort Lewis Military
Base -- because it's owned by the State of Washington -- which rents the
property to the US Army. Other parts of Fort Lewis are rented out to fa
Indeed, there have been other instances where the military has set up AM/FM
transmitters in the US.
There are currently TIS type operations at some military bases, such as the one
on 1500 at Fort Lewis WA.
At one time, there was a large network of AFRS stations across Alaska,
including some wi
As long as the tower isn't on the base/military property, they can license
to Camp Lejune, Camp Pendleton or whatever all they want and the Military
can't do diddly squat
Paul
On 4/16/07, Charles A Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 06:19 PM 4/16/2007 -0700, you wrote:
> >First -- not ALL
At 06:19 PM 4/16/2007 -0700, you wrote:
>First -- not ALL military bases are federal property. Some are rented
>and like Fort Lewis, Washington -- . Most of the base is State Property
>and some is owned by private land owners as well as other federal
>agencies. FM channel 104.9 A was alloca
First -- not ALL military bases are federal property. Some are rented and
like Fort Lewis, Washington -- . Most of the base is State Property and some
is owned by private land owners as well as other federal agencies. FM channel
104.9 A was allocated at one time to San Clemente, California.
At 06:15 PM 4/16/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>The station can be licensed to a base all it wants, as long as the tower
>isn't on the base or military property the base commander has no say or
>authority
>
>Paul
>
Paul,
That's the point. As long as the station isn't on Federal property, they
can sa
12 matches
Mail list logo
