-
From: "Chuck Hutton"
To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 8:42:36 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Rockworks, Oregon Non-DX Report for Oct. 24th
Gary -
We split up with the idea of comparing the 2 locations. We think 4 has horizon
blockage from 300 degre
ct 2015 20:00:08 -0700
> From: d...@guyatkins.com
> To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Rockworks, Oregon Non-DX Report for Oct. 24th
>
> Hi Gary, there were two of us at Rock works 2 and two of us at Rockworks 4.
> In fact, each location had a Flag or ALA100LN mast su
Hi Gary, there were two of us at Rock works 2 and two of us at Rockworks 4.
In fact, each location had a Flag or ALA100LN mast supported loop (50 or
more feet in circumference) as well as one or more Wellbrook 1-meter active
loops at each site.
Our results were the same at each turnout, no matter
;Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America"
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 1:57:35 PM
Subject: [IRCA] Rockworks, Oregon Non-DX Report for Oct. 24th
I've noticed some comments from Nick, Colin, and Gary that inland DX
reception this morning was "TP dead", &q
Goes to show that no location, apart from Walt's Haida Gwaii perch (where you
can practically see Japan from his cabin windows...) is immune to the current
spate of depression inducing solar terrestrial conditions...
The difference between "The Rock Works" and My QTH is that my bed is only 2
fl
I've noticed some comments from Nick, Colin, and Gary that inland DX
reception this morning was "TP dead", "maybe some carriers if I squint",
etc.Fla
Well, those descriptions fit the Rockworks cliffs this morning also! Chuck
Hutton, Dave Aichelman, Chris Black, and myself tried everything but trib
