sent this over a day ago, with no sign yet, soanother attempt...
At 18:25 13/06/2007, you wrote:
Nick,
Could it be a DU or a TP with a weak carrier on 1359? Just a thought
Bill
An excellent possibility, Bill, which had escaped me.I've never
logged anything on 1359 at home, and I
At 18:25 13/06/2007, you wrote:
Nick,
Could it be a DU or a TP with a weak carrier on 1359? Just a thought
Bill
An excellent possibility, Bill, which had escaped me.I've never
logged anything on 1359 at home, and I thought that 0545UT would be
too early anyway. But at this time of year,
The Amadeus Pro sonogram shows two unusual signals, one at about 1.1
kHz, with slight drift, and another, which meanders about, between
750 Hz and 850 Hz. This is over the time period from midnight to
02:40 am.
Dave
On 13-Jun-07, at 1:14 AM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
been going over my
At 11:32 13/06/2007, you wrote:
The Amadeus Pro sonogram shows two unusual signals, one at about 1.1
kHz, with slight drift, and another, which meanders about, between
750 Hz and 850 Hz. This is over the time period from midnight to
02:40 am.
Dave
The 1 kHz I saw was pretty much dead on
Nick,
Could it be a DU or a TP with a weak carrier on 1359? Just a thought
Bill
Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
been going over my recordings of 1360 during the WNJC test, andno
code, no sweeps, just KKMO and KUIK.
However, was someone testing on the channel with a 1 kHz tone? I
have one
I went back and reviewed my SDR recordings of 1360, and saw a carrier
on 1359, present well before the start of the test; it was audible as
well and faded out by 0500 UTC. I would think that's consistent with
a TA (on this side of the country),
Brett
Central PA
On Jun 13, 2007, at 2:25 PM,
Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WNJC-1360
Nick et al,
I recorded about 15 minutes of close to three of their loops and there was
no dead air. There was continuous
PROTECTED]
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WNJC-1360
At 12:08 10/06/2007, you wrote:
. I am a rank novice at Spectran but, if only a
portion of a five minute loop containing voice
Les Rayburn wrote:
I also agree that it will be nice to have exact times for the QRSS portion
of the test. But can't guarantee that it will be possible for some tests.
Even the upcoming KXTO test, for example...at present, I do not know the
exact times that the QRSS portions of the test.
: Sunday, June 10, 2007 12:33 AM
Subject: [IRCA] WNJC-1360
Good vocal ID by male announcer, low voice. 12:31am EDT. Sweep tone like
a
bomb falling in a cartoon. Just missing the BOOM at the end. ;) Also
the phone off the hook sounder. All good and on top of the other
stations.
Craig Healy
At 12:08 10/06/2007, you wrote:
. I am a rank novice at Spectran but, if only a
portion of a five minute loop containing voice and other sound effects, for
example, contained this slow code at a different offset, how would you know
when to change from regular reception to Spectran QRSS?
If you
I didn't see the QRSS during the times I checked; the code showed up
+/-1 kHz from the carrier on a spectral display,
Brett Saylor
Central PA
Did anybody hear (see) the QRSS, i.e. was it broadcast?Also, does
anybody know what pitch the regular code ID's used?Running
Patrick Martin's
Nick,
To keep my fingers toes both crossed (hi), I am going to send a CD to
Les. It is worth a shot. It was a skip signal that came out of nowhere
alright (The old being at the right time place) at 0203 EDT, as I can
hear an earlier sweep tone start to fade up, then the next one quite
loud, and
-
From: Nick Hall-Patch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WNJC-1360
At 12:08 10/06/2007, you wrote:
. I am a rank novice at Spectran but, if only a
portion of a five
No QRSS noted here just the one shot of sweep tones.
73,
Patrick
Patrick Martin
KAVT Reception Manager
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing
Chris Black wrote:
But my point was: If I were going to test traditional modulation with
something exotic like slow code (true QRSS or otherwise), then I would not
bury it within the regular data, but segment it in some way so that the
recipient would know to alter his receiving technique.
Brett Saylor wrote:
I didn't see the QRSS during the times I checked; the code showed up
+/-1 kHz from the carrier on a spectral display,
I only listened for the first hour of the test, and did not see any QRSS
tones at all.
The sawtooth, sweeps, dual-tone pulses, and conventional CW were
I logged from midnight to about 02:40 on USB, 2.7 kHz bw.
In looking at the log, using the sonogram display in Amadeus Pro, the
1 kHz Morse as well as the various tones and the phone off the hook
are all clearly visible, but there is no sign of a Morse signal at
2.5 kHz.
Dave
On
Amazing! Right thru the ultra-dominant KSCJ. Had possible broken tones (CW IDs)
just before that after several minutes of constant tone. Weak. Thanks! 73,
George S., MN
-
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
This from the DXHub e-mail list this morning:
We are going to do some transmitter testing this Saturday, well Sunday
morning from midnight to at least 4am, if not till 6am. We will be
running 4,000 Watts, Non-Directional doing a transmitter tests.
Programming will be morse code ids, sweep
Just received QSL from Les Rayburn for WNJC 1360 DX Test on 10/6/06.
Thanks to all involved with the test.
QSL #6 from New Jersey.
Tom Jasinski
Shorewood, IL
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
21 matches
Mail list logo
