d man talking //1323
> > 1035 likely CNR1 echoey talk by woman 1312UT, seemed //981
> > 1053 man talking, Japanese inflection 1348UT
> > 1089 male ballad 1342,not //NHK2, but didn't sound like the classical
> fare
> > often heard on CNR5
> > 1152 NHK2 woman talking //774 1327UT
> > 1179 ma
Here...here,
-Original Message-
From: IRCA [mailto:irca-boun...@hard-core-dx.com] On Behalf Of Russ Edmunds
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 10:03 AM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
I think one has to take a
Here...here.
-Original Message-
From: IRCA [mailto:irca-boun...@hard-core-dx.com] On Behalf Of Mike Bates
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 2:47 PM
To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
Hi Todd,
As one referred to in your comments, I would defer to
-
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 09:45:16 +
From: Todd S
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Back in the 80's 8
That was my easiest TA in the past. Thanks for that info Marc. I missed
that information.
Todd
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:52 AM Marc DeLorenzo via IRCA <
irca@hard-core-dx.com> wrote:
>
> Todd-
>
> Don't bother to try for France-1206. Sadly, they, along with virtually
> all MW outlets in Franc
_
From: IRCA on behalf of Marc DeLorenzo via IRCA
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:52:11 AM
To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Cc: Marc DeLorenzo
Subject: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.
ic-DX
-Original Message-
From: Todd S
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Sent: Sun, Mar 26, 2017 5:45 am
Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
Back in the 80's 891 and 1521 were always in together right after Sunset
night after night. The same
Back in the 80's 891 and 1521 were always in together right after Sunset
night after night. The same holds true today. Right after sunset, if 890 is
getting a banging het from 891, I check 530, 550 and 710 and each and every
time all have hets on them from 531, 549, and 711 always in semi au cx and
--- Begin Message ---
Since I am a frequent reporter of just barely audible carriers, often making
assumptions on what they are, here`s my take:
There are formally no ``new ones`` for me, since long ago I distanced myself
from the rat race of tallying up station/country counts, not only on MW bu
Other than in my own mind, I do not put “heards” or “think-I-heards” in my log.
For instance, I know I had Norway on 1314 a couple of years ago. My wife is of
Norwegian extraction. There wasn't enough audio for her to opine so I sent it
to the parents of one of our Rotary exchange students in No
Thank you all for your input. Looks like my conservative approach
follows the majority's approach regarding carrier logging.
Good DX!
Stan, WA1LOU
On 3/22/2017 8:24 AM, Stan Horzepa wrote:
I have been chasing DX for almost 50 years.
In ham radio, when I exchange signal reports with a DX sta
iling list are those of the
> > > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> > > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > &g
Massachusetts
> > MW DXer since 1962 - 105 countries heard on MW
> > http://forums.wtfda.org/showthread.php?228-DeLorenzo-s-Classic-DX
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: James Renfrew
> > To: Mailing list for the Internati
I have a problem with DX'ers who report JBA carriers in their official
log.. i think that should be banned form hitting us, but it's not..
so... Why some places accept logs like that is beyond me,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Todd S wrote:
> I ask this question because it is
I ask this question because it is 100% disrespectful to throw an
insinuation of accusations across a board like this. It should have been
banned from even hitting all of us. SMH
Todd Skaine
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:02 AM Todd S wrote:
> Who would that dxer be?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017
Who would that dxer be?
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:51 AM Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
walkerbroadcast...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When DXing, I might report a carrier as an aside, as an FYI type of thing
> to others, especially if it's some rare signal or something I or others
> have been hunting.
>
> But u
ew
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@hard-core-dx.com>
> Sent: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 9:04 am
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
>
> A carrier or weak audio may likely be a particular station, and if I have
> previous
When DXing, I might report a carrier as an aside, as an FYI type of thing
to others, especially if it's some rare signal or something I or others
have been hunting.
But unlike one very well known DX'er, I don't log a JBA carrier, assume
what station that is and put it in my "official" log. No... n
: James Renfrew
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Sent: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 9:04 am
Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one
A carrier or weak audio may likely be a particular station, and if I have
previously logged it with IDable material I may presume that
Hi Stan,
I think the answers from Jim and Richard encapsulate things pretty
well concerning "logging" based on hearing carriers or faint mumbling
on an unusual channel. There are likely those on the list who
wonder about the point of reporting overseas carriers, to the point
of thinking tha
Stan:
I do report hearing carrier signals and heterodynes to the group simply to
indicate propagation conditions at my QTH. But I don't claim them as new
stations heard unless there is something more than a whistle. That is why my
total stations logged is no greater than it is. I've definite
A carrier or weak audio may likely be a particular station, and if I have
previously logged it with IDable material I may presume that it's what I've
previously heard. So that's not claiming a new station, just reporting on
reception conditions. You could argue that a distinct known offset, like
I have been chasing DX for almost 50 years.
In ham radio, when I exchange signal reports with a DX station, I enter
the station in the log.
With one-way DX'ing (LW, MW, FM, TV, etc.), when I hear (or see) the
call sign of the DX station, I enter the station in the log.
But what about all th
23 matches
Mail list logo