Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

NHK2 woman talking //774 1327UT > > 1179 man talking at high speed, Japanese inflection 1346UT > > 1242 man talking, Japanese inflection 1406UT > > 1323 CRI woman talking //963 1312UT > > 1593 CNR1 man talking //945 1331UT > > 1593 NHK2 man talking //774 1404UT > > > > > > Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or > > ravaged by splatter) > > > > 621 657 819 855 936 1098 1143 1503 1512 1575 seemed to be Asian;1098 > > seemed DU > > > > > > -- > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 09:45:16 + > > From: Todd S <amdxing1...@gmail.com> > > To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America > > <irca@hard-core-dx.com> > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one > > Message-ID: > >

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Here...here, -Original Message- From: IRCA [mailto:irca-boun...@hard-core-dx.com] On Behalf Of Russ Edmunds Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 10:03 AM To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one I think one has to take

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Here...here. -Original Message- From: IRCA [mailto:irca-boun...@hard-core-dx.com] On Behalf Of Mike Bates Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 2:47 PM To: irca@hard-core-dx.com Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one Hi Todd, As one referred to in your comments, I would defer

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

21 657 819 855 936 1098 1143 1503 1512 1575 seemed to be Asian;1098 seemed DU -- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 09:45:16 + From: Todd S <amdxing1...@gmail.com> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@hard-core-dx

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

That was my easiest TA in the past. Thanks for that info Marc. I missed that information. Todd On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:52 AM Marc DeLorenzo via IRCA < irca@hard-core-dx.com> wrote: > > Todd- > > Don't bother to try for France-1206. Sadly, they, along with virtually > all MW outlets in

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

...@hard-core-dx.com> on behalf of Marc DeLorenzo via IRCA <irca@hard-core-dx.com> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:52:11 AM To: irca@hard-core-dx.com Cc: Marc DeLorenzo Subject: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one ___ IRCA mailing list IRCA

[IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

-Original Message- From: Todd S <amdxing1...@gmail.com> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@hard-core-dx.com> Sent: Sun, Mar 26, 2017 5:45 am Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one Back in the 80's 891 and 1521 were always in together

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Back in the 80's 891 and 1521 were always in together right after Sunset night after night. The same holds true today. Right after sunset, if 890 is getting a banging het from 891, I check 530, 550 and 710 and each and every time all have hets on them from 531, 549, and 711 always in semi au cx

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

--- Begin Message --- Since I am a frequent reporter of just barely audible carriers, often making assumptions on what they are, here`s my take: There are formally no ``new ones`` for me, since long ago I distanced myself from the rat race of tallying up station/country counts, not only on MW

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Other than in my own mind, I do not put “heards” or “think-I-heards” in my log. For instance, I know I had Norway on 1314 a couple of years ago. My wife is of Norwegian extraction. There wasn't enough audio for her to opine so I sent it to the parents of one of our Rotary exchange students in

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Thank you all for your input. Looks like my conservative approach follows the majority's approach regarding carrier logging. Good DX! Stan, WA1LOU On 3/22/2017 8:24 AM, Stan Horzepa wrote: I have been chasing DX for almost 50 years. In ham radio, when I exchange signal reports with a DX

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

on MW > > > http://forums.wtfda.org/showthread.php?228-DeLorenzo-s-Classic-DX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: James Renfrew <jim.renf...@gmail.com> > > > To

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

od, Massachusetts > > MW DXer since 1962 - 105 countries heard on MW > > http://forums.wtfda.org/showthread.php?228-DeLorenzo-s-Classic-DX > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: James Renfrew <jim.renf...@gmail.com>

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

I have a problem with DX'ers who report JBA carriers in their official log.. i think that should be banned form hitting us, but it's not.. so... Why some places accept logs like that is beyond me, On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Todd S wrote: > I ask

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

I ask this question because it is 100% disrespectful to throw an insinuation of accusations across a board like this. It should have been banned from even hitting all of us. SMH Todd Skaine On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:02 AM Todd S wrote: > Who would that dxer be? > >

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Who would that dxer be? On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:51 AM Paul B. Walker, Jr. < walkerbroadcast...@gmail.com> wrote: > When DXing, I might report a carrier as an aside, as an FYI type of thing > to others, especially if it's some rare signal or something I or others > have been hunting. > > But

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

frew <jim.renf...@gmail.com> > To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America < > irca@hard-core-dx.com> > Sent: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 9:04 am > Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one > > A carrier or weak audio may likely be a particular station,

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

When DXing, I might report a carrier as an aside, as an FYI type of thing to others, especially if it's some rare signal or something I or others have been hunting. But unlike one very well known DX'er, I don't log a JBA carrier, assume what station that is and put it in my "official" log. No...

[IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

: James Renfrew <jim.renf...@gmail.com> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@hard-core-dx.com> Sent: Wed, Mar 22, 2017 9:04 am Subject: Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one A carrier or weak audio may likely be a particular station, and if I have previ

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Hi Stan, I think the answers from Jim and Richard encapsulate things pretty well concerning "logging" based on hearing carriers or faint mumbling on an unusual channel. There are likely those on the list who wonder about the point of reporting overseas carriers, to the point of thinking

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

Stan: I do report hearing carrier signals and heterodynes to the group simply to indicate propagation conditions at my QTH. But I don't claim them as new stations heard unless there is something more than a whistle. That is why my total stations logged is no greater than it is. I've

Re: [IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

A carrier or weak audio may likely be a particular station, and if I have previously logged it with IDable material I may presume that it's what I've previously heard. So that's not claiming a new station, just reporting on reception conditions. You could argue that a distinct known offset, like

[IRCA] philosophy of logging a new one

I have been chasing DX for almost 50 years. In ham radio, when I exchange signal reports with a DX station, I enter the station in the log. With one-way DX'ing (LW, MW, FM, TV, etc.), when I hear (or see) the call sign of the DX station, I enter the station in the log. But what about all