I've been willing to try it with Silverlight Apps, I know it has a lot of
potential and I'm thinking of IR as full replacement of C#. Binding doesn't
work for dynamic objects which is a big showstopper (although I know
there're ways around it, I've not had a chance to get aroudn that). I see a
lot
yes typemock uses the CLR profiling API and is a paid product. I don't know
if typemock runs on Mono either, couldn't find it on their website.
For me running on mono is one of the base requirements of my mocker, because
I'm too often on my mac or linux machines to neglect that.
That being said 99
I've not gone through the full post, but based on the title this might help:
http://richardsbraindump.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-get-git-and-tfs-working-together.html
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Jimmy Schementi <
jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> That blogpost is basically all Jim
TypeMock is doing thing slightly different that allows you to intercept
essentially calls to any member (static, sealed types, non-virtuals, etc).
It take sa different approach than Rhino and Moq, I'm not sure if something
similar could be done using Ruby, I'm just dropping the idea here
On Mo
I've worked with the COR_PROFILER a little bit before... I'll look if
it's possible from IronRuby :)
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Shri Borde wrote:
> Ivan, no, you do not need to instrument your dll to use the profiling APIs.
> Instead, you have to set an environment variable called COR_PROFI
The database has information that is FOUO. Even though to me it seems
that none of the source code has any of that information (why should
it), I don't really want to send any of it other than snippets just to
protect myself. I should be able to put together a different case at
home that has
>
>
> Can we move forward to solve the problem instead of mocking?
> --
>
I would expect you would have better success moving forward if you did not
make inflammatory statements such as these:
"This is a big defect in the IronRuby. Too many configurations will
scare developers away."
"Not many p
Looks good.
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: Shri Borde
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:59 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Code Review: eaccess
tfpt review "/shelveset:eaccess;REDMOND\sborde"
Comment :
Dir.mkdir should raise Err
Looks good
-Original Message-
From: Shri Borde
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:59 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Code Review: eaccess
tfpt review "/shelveset:eaccess;REDMOND\sborde"
Comment :
Dir.mkdir should raise Errno::EACC
tfpt review "/shelveset:eaccess;REDMOND\sborde"
Comment :
Dir.mkdir should raise Errno::EACCESS instead of System.UnauthorizedException
Diables ActiveRecord tests since some fail intermittently
eaccess.diff
Description: eaccess.diff
___
Iro
Ok.
In that case you can find a dev.sh and alias.sh in the following links
http://github.com/casualjim/ironruby/blob/linux/Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby/Scripts/dev.sh
http://github.com/casualjim/ironruby/blob/linux/Merlin/Main/Scripts/Bat/Alias.sh
---
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Sal
no guide so far.
To work and browse the IronRuby source I've been using monodevelop.
For ruby dev I've been using textmate on mac, gmate (plugin for gedit) on
ubuntu and notepad++ on windows, as well as Rubymine on all platforms but
that doesn't feel completely right.
With monodevelop you can ope
I'm currently using IronRuby to do automated UI testing using the WPF UI
Automation framework. IronRuby is working out brilliantly, the WPF UI
automation framework on the other hand is "sub par", but that's another
story.
Have also used it for many ad-hoc tasks such as exploring .NET api's,
transf
Ivan, no, you do not need to instrument your dll to use the profiling APIs.
Instead, you have to set an environment variable called COR_PROFILER.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb384689.aspx has more info.
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforg
The ActiveRecord unit tests do have failures where extra 0s are appended. You
can see it from the following disabled tags in
Merlin\Main\Languages\Ruby\Tests\Scripts\utr\active_record_tests.rb (its not
yet pushed to GIT).
disable InheritanceTest,
# <#> expected but was
# <#>.
Hello everyone,
Recently I've been trying develop a gem with native extensions in C,
Java and C# just to learn what's involved. When working with IronRuby, I
ran into a few small issues so I figured I'd learn how to build and
modify IronRuby source so I can take a shot at fixing these issues a
Any particular reason you aren't using NCover or Clover? I'm not sure
generating coverage reports via rcov (even if it existed for the CLR)
for dlls written in C# would actually produce anything usable.
Cheers,
Sidu.
http://blog.sidu.in
http://twitter.com/ponnappa
Mohammad Azam wrote:
I was tr
The productivity increase vs programming in a language like C# is a big one
too :)
So why ironruby and not ruby?
if you're a .NET shop you probably already have a serious investment in
libraries, control suites and so on.
With IronRuby you don't lose anything you can reuse those items but still
ge
I believe per-user gems is now the default
That's right - now if you sudo install a system wide gem, if not, it
just creates a .gems in your home dir and installs there. Of course, the
local gems are only available to Ruby apps running as that user.
Cheers,
Sidu.
Thibaut Barrère wrote:
Per
Yes, that occurred to me this morning. ;-)
So, runas /user:mymachine\administrator igem install foo for globals gems,
right?
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Thibaut Barrère
wrote:
> > Per-user gems should not be the default. In RubyInstaller (mingw MRI),
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Shay Friedman wrote:
> This question keeps coming back :)
>
> Testing is a great use of IronRuby, maybe even the top reason for .NET guys
> to use it. However, there are more reasons for .NET guys to adopt IronRuby
> like:
>
I agree with that. :-/
> - Make it po
A while back I really thought testing would be the largest use case,
but it went differently - here are my current real use cases:
- faster UI development (windows forms)
- interop with solutions already built on Ruby (see my previous
message on Resque)
- Excel templating (things like embedding IR
Amen to that :D
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
This question keeps coming back :)
Testing is a great use of IronRuby, maybe even the top reason for .NET guys
to use it. However, there are more reasons for .NET guys to adopt IronRuby
like:
- Writing internal tools.
- Make it possible to extend .NET applications using IronRuby.
- Using IronRuby'
I have been using it the last couple months for building out a Silverlight app
and have found a lot less friction coding WPF with IronRuby as opposed to XAML
and C#.
Randall
On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Mohammad Azam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about why to use IronRuby and one of the th
Hi,
I was thinking about why to use IronRuby and one of the things that came
to my mind is because of better gems like spec, cucumber etc. Mostly my
use of IronRuby is around unit testing .NET CLR frameworks. But then
.NET CLR implementations is catching up with all these tools like
specflow and (
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Ivan Porto Carrero wrote:
> rcov has a pure ruby variant too IIRC. And for the sake of this discussion
> let's just say that that works as is with IronRuby.
>
> Then I'd be looking at the CLR profiling api again isn't it.
> And to enable that profiling API don't I
Also, I think Ruby's FFI is relatively new and not in great use, atm, so
even adding FFI to IronRuby wouldn't do a whole lot to enable the C
extensions of most Ruby libraries until those are ported to use FFI. Is that
right?
Ryan Riley
Email: ryan.ri...@panesofglass.org
LinkedIn: http://www.link
What Jimmy said. :D
Ryan Riley
Email: ryan.ri...@panesofglass.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanriley
Blog: http://wizardsofsmart.net/
Twitter: @panesofglass
Website: http://panesofglass.org/
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Jimmy Schementi <
jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
Thanks.
That's excellent - I can easily load gems that way too I guess (adding
foo.zip to the load path).
I got the impression from the "sl back to just text" document that
loading zips wasn't implemented yet - should've just given it a try.
Gestalt does seem really awesome - providing textmate
bugs have been submitted
http://ironruby.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=3655
---
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
Ivan Porto Carrero
Blog: http://flanders.co.nz
Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim
Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero)
On Tue
rcov has a pure ruby variant too IIRC. And for the sake of this discussion
let's just say that that works as is with IronRuby.
Then I'd be looking at the CLR profiling api again isn't it.
And to enable that profiling API don't I have to instrument my dll with some
constants so it knows it's going
> Per-user gems should not be the default. In RubyInstaller (mingw MRI), as
> well as MRI on Linux, and I believe OS X, system-wide gems are
> the default. This, of course, would require elevation (sudo gem install xxx).
I believe per-user gems is now the default (it wasn't in the past, but
if I'
I'm not sure if the CLR profiling API is in Mono I'd have to find that out
first.
My thing against mono.cecil is that you need to instrument the DLL and
rewrite the IL before running your app. I'd prefer to do stuff during
instead of beforehand.
I need to be able to intercept and decide whether t
I'm not seeing that issue atm but I'll work on ironruby-sqlserver tonight.
So if Sam wants to send me a repro I can also look at the cause for his
problem and hopefully fix it.
---
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
Ivan Porto Carrero
Blog: http://flanders.co.nz
Twitter: http://t
How does implementing FFI provide code coverage for the CLR, isn't that
mutually exclusive? Shouldn't FFI provide us with a way to use C-based
extensions? But C-based extensions won't know about the ironruby internals
etc. Just thinking out loud so feel free to correct me :)
Also aren't the stack
I wanted to see "p @company" (equivalent of "puts @company.inspect") to see
what fields it had, since ActiveRecord shows detailed view of the object,
including fields. Really I want to see whether the ID is "269" or "26900".
Ivan, does this issue seem at all familiar to you?
Sam, it'd be helpfu
Sorry for the confusion, I didn’t realize you were just building an external
IronRuby library.
Can you also open a bug against the generator to not spit the “Copyright (c)
Microsoft Corporation” out into user-code? =P
~Jimmy
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun
After 1.0 we’ll be making IronRuby integrate better with its “static” world.
I’m not sure the current state of precompiling, but I’m pretty sure we’re not
even testing it.
~Jimmy
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Porto Carr
Basically, Ruby is able to do all the crazy mocking stuff because of its
mutable type system, and the only way to make the CLR's type-system mutable is
to rewrite the IL. To put it in SAT terms:
"rewriting IL" is to "static languages" as "monkey-patching" is to "dynamic
languages"
=P
~Jimmy
That blogpost is basically all Jim and I would want to do – wrap the GIT and
TFS command-lines. A step above that would be to use grit (GIT implementation
in Ruby … or even Git#) as well as the TFS APIs. But as Jim said, we haven’t
found the time to make this really nice, so I welcome anyone els
41 matches
Mail list logo
