pitrou opened a new pull request #54:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/54
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
pitrou merged pull request #54:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/54
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
mrkn opened a new pull request #55:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/55
Add test case files downloaded from issues below:
- https://oss-fuzz.com/testcase-detail/6583463383793664
- https://oss-fuzz.com/testcase-detail/623225726408
-
mrkn commented on pull request #55:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/55#issuecomment-77764
@pitrou I'll merge this for working on apache/arrow#9395. Please tell me if
there is any problem.
This is an au
mrkn merged pull request #55:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/55
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
pitrou opened a new pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
pitrou commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56#issuecomment-772592633
I'm not sure what the naming scheme should be. I chose "1.0.0" for the
format version, but is it the Arrow library version that generated the files
instead? (in which case it s
pitrou commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56#issuecomment-772601749
The JSON files are refused by the Java Arrow integration test:
```
Incompatible files
Expected END_OBJECT but got FIELD_NAME
16:30:12.557 [main] ERROR org.apache.arro
pitrou commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56#issuecomment-772617773
Ok, I edited the JSON files by hand to remove the offending field and now
Java manages to read them (**cringe**), though it fails to instantiate the
compression:
```
java
pitrou edited a comment on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56#issuecomment-772592633
I'm not sure what the naming scheme should be. I chose "1.0.0" for the
format version, but is it the Arrow library version that generated the files
instead? (in which ca
emkornfield commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56#issuecomment-772638909
Strange, I wonder why main integration tests aren't broken for the JSON
issue. Regarding versioning, I used the library version that generated them.
It seems like a bug
pitrou commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56#issuecomment-772679092
> Strange, I wonder why main integration tests aren't broken for the JSON
issue.
Because the JSON files that are used in the integration tests are generated
by the Pyth
pitrou commented on pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56#issuecomment-772679327
I renamed to "2.0.0-compression", will merge.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
pitrou merged pull request #56:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/56
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
pitrou opened a new pull request #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/57
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
pitrou merged pull request #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/57
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
kiszk opened a new pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/58
This PR adds golden files for decimal256 in big and little endians.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
kiszk commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/58#issuecomment-782888672
@pitrou Could you please review this? It works well on my local machine.
This is an automated message from the A
kiszk edited a comment on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/58#issuecomment-782888672
@pitrou Could you please review this? It works well on my local big-endian
machine.
This is an automated
pitrou commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/58#issuecomment-783354606
Thanks. Can you also remove the "large batch" files in the endian
directories? They are heavy to run and don't bring anything IMHO.
---
kiszk commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/58#issuecomment-785697113
Sure, done
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
pitrou merged pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/58
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
pitrou commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/58#issuecomment-785888734
Now you need to update the testing submodule in the Arrow main repo :-)
This is an automated message from the A
jmgpeeters opened a new pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59
ARROW-11838 aims to add C++ read capability for IPC data with shared
dictionaries.
Write support isn't available yet either, and out of scope here, so these
files - allowing testing of th
pitrou commented on pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59#issuecomment-796719583
@jmgpeeters It seems these should go into the "golden files" used for
integration testing, see
https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/tree/master/data/arrow-ipc-stream/integra
jmgpeeters commented on pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59#issuecomment-796737078
Ah, thanks, I wasn't aware of the Archery integration suite. Had a quick
glance, and seems to make sense. Was a bit worried it would require support in
all languages for sh
pitrou commented on pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59#issuecomment-796768922
Indeed, the JSON format doesn't support it, so that will be a problem if we
want to do roundtripping tests with the integration machinery.
However, I think we can still use t
jmgpeeters commented on pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59#issuecomment-796777534
Agreed. I'll make the changes and get back to you.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
jmgpeeters commented on pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59#issuecomment-801014168
@pitrou I've moved the golden files into 4.0.0-shareddicts and created a
json.gz to validate against.
Is 4.0.0 right? Not quite sure what the convention is, but - assumin
pitrou commented on pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59#issuecomment-801043407
@jmgpeeters That sounds right. AFAIU, the version number is the Arrow
release (at least C++ or Java) that these files are supposed to be compatible
with.
pitrou merged pull request #59:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/59
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
jmgpeeters opened a new pull request #60:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/60
Chasing the Java integration errors in
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9629 (although C++ passes), it appears I
misunderstood the correct layout for the offset buffer (for ["foo", "bar",
"b
pitrou commented on pull request #60:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/60#issuecomment-801922086
Hmm, C++ shouldn't have accepted the non-conformant buffer. Can you try to
find where the missing checks need to be added?
jmgpeeters commented on pull request #60:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/60#issuecomment-801926268
Yep, will do.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
jmgpeeters commented on pull request #60:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/60#issuecomment-802687306
@pitrou I've implemented some additional checks in the Arrow sister PR. The
C++ integration check
(https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9629/checks?check_run_id=2142504660)
pitrou merged pull request #60:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/60
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, pleas
pitrou opened a new pull request #61:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/61
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
pitrou merged pull request #61:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/61
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, pleas
pitrou merged pull request #61:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/61
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, pleas
Igosuki opened a new pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62
N.B. : I used spark for the translation so there is some additional metadata
in the files, but they can be removed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
pitrou commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-907779226
This seems fine to me, but can you add a README explaining what these files
are and how they were obtained?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
kiszk commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-907837124
Looks good to me
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
alamb commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-908261976
@Igosuki -- I added a basic README in
https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62/commits/8d306efa213b859645c68f60ee1f6db0b1997b43
-- can you provide the command you used t
Igosuki commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-909371276
@alamb https://gist.github.com/Igosuki/324b011f40185269d3fc552350d21744
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Igosuki commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-909372257
It would be possible to use arrow-python and fastavro to achieve the same, I
just have a lot of Spark experience and I prefer typed so I went that way.
--
This is an automat
Igosuki commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-909371276
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #63:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/63
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #64:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/64
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
alamb commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-916343370
Thanks @Igosuki ! I am sorry for the delayed response -- I am catching up
from being on vacation and hope to help push your contributions over the line
real soon now
--
This
alamb commented on a change in pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#discussion_r705603662
##
File path: data/avro/README.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+This directory contains AVRO files corresponding to the parquet testing files
at https://github.com
alamb merged pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubsc
Igosuki commented on pull request #62:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/62#issuecomment-916663346
All good :+1:
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
pitrou merged pull request #65:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/65
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #66:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/66
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #66:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/66
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #67:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/67
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #68:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/68
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #69:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/69
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #70:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/70
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou merged pull request #71:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/71
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
chadbrewbaker opened a new pull request #72:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/72
See https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1036
Serialization of {"emptylist":[]} is causing a panic in arrow-rs.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To res
kou opened a new issue #273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/273
`apache/*` repositories can use only allowed GitHub Actions in
`.github/workflows/`.
We need to ask INFRA to add the following GitHub Actions to allow list:
* `julia-actions/julia-buildpkg@v1.2`
kou commented on issue #273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/273#issuecomment-1002772335
I've opened INFRA issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22676
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
kou opened a new issue #271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/271
We can configure this repository's metadata by `.asf.yaml`. See also:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features
We should change at least notification configurations. A
kou commented on issue #271:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/271#issuecomment-1002774494
We want to send only "issue create" notifications to
`issues@arrow.apache.org`.
The current configuration sends all issue related notifications to
`issues@arrow.apache.org`.
--
jakkosdev opened a new issue #275:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/275
`Arrow.write("testcsv.arrow", CSV.Chunks("data.csv"), ntasks=2)`
with data.csv:
```
heading1,heading2,heading3
test1, test2, 3
test1, test2, 3
test1, test2, 3
test1, test2, 3
quinnj closed issue #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/265
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...
quinnj commented on issue #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/265#issuecomment-1003086025
Repo has been transferred
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
kou closed issue #273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/273
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ar
kou closed issue #253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/253
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ar
quinnj opened a new issue #279:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/279
In #278, there was some brief discussion around what the new release process
looks like now that the repo has been transferred. I'd like to propose the
following and we can see if this will work in terms
sl-solution opened a new issue #280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/280
Not sure if it makes sense, but, would it be possible to allow missing type
without copying the underlining arrow vector? As far as I understand, allowing
missing only changes the `Type` of arrow ve
westonpace opened a new pull request #74:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/74
This adds an example IPC file containing a delta dictionary for both the
file and the streaming IPC format. It requires a small change to the
integration programs (https://github.com/apache/arro
pitrou merged pull request #73:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/73
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
Poncito opened a new issue #281:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/281
Hello,
I have a custom type defined this way:
```julia
struct Char8 <: AbstractChar
x::UInt8
end
Char8(x::Integer) = Char8(UInt8(x))
Char8(x::AbstractChar) = Char8(UInt8(x)
pitrou merged pull request #75:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/75
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
NHDaly opened a new issue #282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/282
We have a data source (Relations from our database engine at RelationalAI)
that have _columnar data_, but without column names. (We represent a Relation
as a Set of Tuples, e.g. `movie_title` relates movi
baumgold opened a new issue #283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/283
It appears that Arrow.jl somehow incorrectly handles columns with nullable
types (Union with Nothing) as the schema of the resulting table containing such
a column doesn't match what's reported by `Tabl
quinnj opened a new issue #284:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/284
Hey all,
I'm opening this issue to facilitate some discussion around the current
state of and future direction of the Julia arrow implementation (that lives in
this repo). As the original primary c
baumgold opened a new issue #285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/285
When writing a table with Arrow.jl that contains a nullable column, the
Arrow data cannot be read by Pyarrow. Note that when using Missing instead of
Nothing Pyarrow can read the data written by Arrow.
kou opened a new issue #286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/286
We must satisfy the Apache-2.0 license and not include code the "Category X"
https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x .
There is a tool to check this: https://creadur.apache.org/rat/
We
kou opened a new issue #287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/287
Most of release process can be automated like
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/dev/release/release-tarball.sh .
We should have a release script to decrease maintenance cost.
--
This is
kou opened a new issue #288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/288
There aren't PMC members who are familiar with Julia.
It's helpful to provide a verification script for them. They can't vote
without verification.
See also:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob
quinnj closed issue #286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/286
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...
baumgold opened a new issue #291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/291
It would be very useful to support reading (and potentially writing)
partitioned datasets. The implementation could be similar to
JuliaIO/Parquet.jl#138/JuliaIO/Parquet.jl#142 and would bring Arrow.jl
quinnj closed issue #287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/287
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...
kou closed issue #288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/288
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ar
pitrou merged pull request #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/79
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
pitrou commented on pull request #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/79#issuecomment-1055532430
FYI @tachyonwill
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
pitrou commented on pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/78#issuecomment-1055533136
@tachyonwill Sorry for not noticing this. Nobody is actively watching the
PRs for this repository, so you should ping a core developer when you open a PR.
--
This is an auto
pitrou merged pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/78
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
complyue opened a new issue #293:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/293
I see #23 closed but only *stream* format got supported.
How about files in "arrow file" format, each with multiple record batches
inside?
With released version I get a single `Table` as t
complyue opened a new issue #294:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/294
I'm figuring out ways to have table columns processed by GPU, those coming
from "arrow file" format files `mmap`ed for zero-copy.
The full series can not fit into GRAM, while each batch record can
complyue opened a new issue #295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/295
https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/614fce0a5d7db8fee078be32690c5220848538e2/src/table.jl#L276-L293
I see from above that record batches will be parsed (esp. decompression
could be rather
emkornfield merged pull request #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/77
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-u
emkornfield merged pull request #76:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-testing/pull/76
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-u
quinnj closed issue #284:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/284
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...
nilshg opened a new issue #300:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/300
As discussed on Slack:
```
julia> using Arrow, DataFrames
julia> Arrow.write("test.arrow", (a = [1, 2], b = Any[3, 4.5]))
"test.arrow"
julia> DataFrame(Arrow.Table("test.arrow"))
kou opened a new issue #301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/301
It publishes to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-X.Y.Z but
we should remove "apache-" prefix because other release doesn't have "apache-"
prefix.
--
This is an automate
kou closed issue #301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/301
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ar
1 - 100 of 1554 matches
Mail list logo
