Yogesh Rao created CAMEL-5979:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Camel-Quickfix dynamic SenderSubId/TargetSubId issue
                 Key: CAMEL-5979
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5979
             Project: Camel
          Issue Type: New Feature
          Components: camel-quickfix
    Affects Versions: 2.10.3
         Environment: QuickFix/J version 1.5 on JDK 1.6.x
            Reporter: Yogesh Rao
            Priority: Critical


I am facing an issue with camel-quickfix component for the following scenario.

We have a FIX message coming in to the Quickfix/J engine i.e. logon request 
with only the senderID and TargetID populated and the engine successfully 
processes the logon request based on the configuration. The subsequent requests 
for Single Order (Tag # 35 = D) the message received contains the optional 
values SenderSubID and TargetSubID populated, the message is picked up by the 
camel component without any issue but its only when a reply has to sent to the 
sender the component ends up throwing a error i.e. IllegalStateException : 
Unknown Session... I looked into the code 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/components/camel-quickfix/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/component/quickfixj/QuickfixjConsumer.java
 and found the issue. The session ID is being reconstructed from the out value 
being set into the exchange object which as per API used would construct the 
session containing SenderID,SenderSubID,TargetID and TargetSubID which is 
getting compared to the session set during the logon process which only 
contains the SenderID and TargetID and hence doesn't matches and returns a 
null. On receiving the null value the code ends up throwing the 
IllegalStateException. Looking at the QuickFixJConsumer code i do understand 
the importance of reconstructing the SessionID object from the Message set as 
Out in Exchange but from what i read about various client implementations on 
using FIX the above scenario mentioned also holds good. For now I have gone 
ahead and patched the QuickFixJConsumer code for my project by picking up the 
session id set in Exchange object rather than recreating it using the 
MessageUtils. But i feel in a longer run a elegant solution has to be put in 
place rather than user of camel patching the code up for their use:) 
In case you need any further details do let me know.. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to