[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-5553:
-------------------------------
    Summary: camel-cdi - support injection of Endpoint and @Produce @Consume 
annotations  (was: support injection of Endpoint and @Produce @Consume 
annotations)

> camel-cdi - support injection of Endpoint and @Produce @Consume annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-5553
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5553
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-cdi
>            Reporter: james strachan
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> we don't yet support the various camel annotation injections in CDI yet; we 
> should support the same capabilities as we have in spring/guice
> http://camel.apache.org/bean-integration.html
> http://camel.apache.org/bean-injection.html
> I guess a more CDI way to do endpoint injection might be to have an 
> annotation for endpointURI specification. Then you'd either use 
> {code}
> public class MyBean { 
>   // named reference injection
>   @Inject @Named("foo") Endpoint bar;
>   // URI based injection
>   @Inject @Uri("mock:whatnot") MockEndpoint foo;
> ...
> }
> {code}
> Rather than using the DI-agnostic @EndpointInject annotation - though I guess 
> we could support it too (though having Inject twice looks a bit icky and not 
> as DRY)...
> {code}
> public class MyBean { 
>   // using current annotation...
>   @Inject @EndpointInject(uri = "mock:whatnot") MockEndpoint bar;
> ...
> }
> {code}
> For handling @Consume it would be nice to avoid having to use @Inject too as 
> that seems a bit odd (since there's no injection going on).
> For @Produce I guess we could support a straight @Inject of a 
> ProcessorTemplate; allowing use of @Uri annotation to specify the default URI 
> to send to



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to