[jira] Commented: (LANG-589) StringUtils: indexOf(, String) and indexOf(, char) have different behaviour

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830691#action_12830691 ] Valentin Rocher commented on LANG-589: -- In the javadoc, the only example with as first

[jira] Commented: (LANG-588) Create a basic PairL, R class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830713#action_12830713 ] Sebb commented on LANG-588: --- Why do you need readObject()? Surely the hashCode could just be

[jira] Commented: (MATH-246) Simplex Method Implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830716#action_12830716 ] Jurgen Tas commented on MATH-246: - Benjamin thank you for your reaction. However, I am not

[jira] Commented: (LANG-588) Create a basic PairL, R class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830723#action_12830723 ] Matt Benson commented on LANG-588: -- My concern regarding the hashCode, Seb, is that a

[jira] Commented: (LANG-582) Provide an implementation of the ThreadFactory interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830726#action_12830726 ] Oliver Heger commented on LANG-582: --- BasicThreadFactory is fine with me. Provide an

[jira] Commented: (CONFIGURATION-407) HierarchicalINIConfiguration.getSection() is not thread-safe if the global section is requested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830775#action_12830775 ] Sebb commented on CONFIGURATION-407: Thread-safety means more than just

[jira] Created: (LANG-591) A more complex Levenshtein distance would be useful

A more complex Levenshtein distance would be useful --- Key: LANG-591 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-591 Project: Commons Lang Issue Type: New Feature Components:

[jira] Updated: (LANG-591) A more complex Levenshtein distance would be useful

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benson Margulies updated LANG-591: -- Attachment: LANG-591.diff Patch. A more complex Levenshtein distance would be useful

[jira] Created: (DAEMON-132) Prunmgr shows wrong default logging level.

Prunmgr shows wrong default logging level. -- Key: DAEMON-132 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-132 Project: Commons Daemon Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.0.1

[jira] Commented: (LANG-591) A more complex Levenshtein distance would be useful

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830824#action_12830824 ] Benson Margulies commented on LANG-591: --- Fair enough. How abouts I refine it outside