[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17800316#comment-17800316
]
Niall Pemberton commented on IO-337:
I will -1 this change if it is ever committed since it would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17800314#comment-17800314
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on IO-337:
We can reconsider for the next major version IMO.
> ByteOrderMark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17800311#comment-17800311
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold commented on IO-337:
--
IMHO this one is probably not worth the incompatibility.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14567831#comment-14567831
]
Niall Pemberton commented on IO-337:
There are more byte order marks than the five defined
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393532#comment-13393532
]
Sebb commented on IO-337:
-
Nice idea, but this will break compatibility.
It might be possible to
An Enum sounds good but it has to work with all of the current code. We can
then deprecate the current one. What would be the name of this Enum? Maybe this
is a change we should wait to introduce if and when we break BC in the future.
Gary
On Jun 17, 2012, at 8:00, Sebb (JIRA) j...@apache.org
