echauchot merged PR #25:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-shared-utils/pull/25
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
snuyanzin commented on code in PR #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-shared-utils/pull/25#discussion_r1413196788
##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -558,6 +563,8 @@ under the License.
US
en
echauchot commented on code in PR #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-shared-utils/pull/25#discussion_r1412014261
##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -558,6 +563,8 @@ under the License.
US
en
echauchot commented on PR #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-shared-utils/pull/25#issuecomment-1835994166
>> @snuyanzin can you elaborate on the use cases you have in mind for
systemPropertyVariable surefire.module.config ?
> The use case is testing against jdk17/21
snuyanzin commented on PR #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-shared-utils/pull/25#issuecomment-1835851027
The use case is testing against jdk17/21
The issue with these jdks is that sometimes it is from one side required to
add `add-opens/export` flags for tests like it
echauchot commented on PR #25:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-shared-utils/pull/25#issuecomment-1834048030
@snuyanzin can you elaborate on the use cases you have in mind for
systemPropertyVariable surefire.module.config ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
snuyanzin opened a new pull request, #25:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-shared-utils/pull/25
The idea is to apply same approach as for Flink main repo and it's modules
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
