vinayakphegde commented on code in PR #5528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5528#discussion_r1398666808
##
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/MasterWalManager.java:
##
@@ -398,4 +414,33 @@ public void archiveMetaLog(final ServerName serverName)
vinayakphegde commented on code in PR #5528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5528#discussion_r1398666429
##
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/MasterWalManager.java:
##
@@ -398,4 +414,33 @@ public void archiveMetaLog(final ServerName serverName)
Apache9 commented on PR #5513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5513#issuecomment-1818167780
> Correct, downgrading to 2.4 does not remove meta's address from master
local region's info:sn. Hence, any downgrade from 2.5 to older versions has
this risk: it neither removes info CF fr
virajjasani commented on PR #5513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5513#issuecomment-1818160242
Correct, downgrading to 2.4 does not remove meta's address from master local
region's info:sn. Hence, any downgrade from 2.5 to older versions has this
risk: it neither removes info CF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17787782#comment-17787782
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-28031:
---
Merged the PR to master.
Let's see if this could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang reassigned HBASE-28031:
-
Assignee: Duo Zhang
> TestClusterScopeQuotaThrottle is still failing with broken WAL writer
> -
Apache9 merged PR #5529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5529
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@hbase.apache.
Apache9 commented on PR #5513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5513#issuecomment-1818119983
> > I would definitely prefer automated solutions rather than rely on HBCK.
IMO anything requiring hbck is a bug.
>
> I agree.
>
> For this case, we now know that the root caus
virajjasani commented on PR #5513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5513#issuecomment-1818097080
> I would definitely prefer automated solutions rather than rely on HBCK.
IMO anything requiring hbck is a bug.
I agree.
For this case, we now know that the root cause was
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5507#issuecomment-1817991865
:broken_heart: **-1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
|::|--:|:|:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 11s | Docker
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5507#issuecomment-1817990558
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
|::|--:|:|:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 27s | Docke
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5507#issuecomment-1817938520
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
|::|--:|:|:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 39s | Docke
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5507#issuecomment-1817930339
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
|::|--:|:|:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 1m 12s | Docke
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5507#issuecomment-1817928706
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
|::|--:|:|:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 0m 28s | Docke
Apache-HBase commented on PR #5507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5507#issuecomment-1817869660
:confetti_ball: **+1 overall**
| Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
|::|--:|:|:|
| +0 :ok: | reexec | 3m 49s | Docke
15 matches
Mail list logo
