[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2023-01-20 Thread via GitHub
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1399111088 > @bbeaudreault How to re run the CI pipeline? Only committers can do it. Actually I was going to merge anyway, cuz we got 3 +1's which is all we really need. The pipeline failed

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2023-01-20 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1398400263 There are some javac (checkstyle) warnings. They are all in the net-new code, and I checked them and master has the same issues. Seems like we skipped cleaning up checkstyle in backup/

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2023-01-20 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1398394580 Nice! I think this looks good. Just waiting on clean pre-commit checks. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2023-01-19 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1397708589 Thanks for doing this @rda3mon -- i made a few small comments, and then I think we should be good. Extra reminder: make sure to run `mvn spotless:apply` after making the request

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2022-11-15 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1315969416 May still be a bit, but I'm finally starting to look at this now. Looks like it's almost all net-new code. I checked out this branch and the following: ``` git diff --c

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2022-09-20 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1253137587 Sorry for the delay here. We are currently evaluating internally in our fork. Will get to reviewing in the near future. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. T

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2022-09-13 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1245477406 @rda3mon looks like that cherry-pick resolved most of the error prone issues. Looks like there are 3 left: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-4770/5/artif

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2022-09-12 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1244797927 @rda3mon I find that the violations are usually pretty straightforward. If there are any that you have a question about, feel free to post here. I do think it's possible to run locally

[GitHub] [hbase] bbeaudreault commented on pull request #4770: HBASE-27238 Backport backup restore to 2.x

2022-09-12 Thread GitBox
bbeaudreault commented on PR #4770: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4770#issuecomment-1244458268 @rda3mon I know this is still just a draft, but can you address the error-prone findings in the pre-commit? Shows up under javac: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub