[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16982600#comment-16982600
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-16786:
Results for branch master
[build #1548 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16982069#comment-16982069
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-16786:
Results for branch branch-2
[build #2365 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16982006#comment-16982006
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-16786:
Results for branch branch-2.2
[build #704 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15838214#comment-15838214
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
[~syuanjiang] Nod. Makes sense. Lets see.
You've seen this:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15838185#comment-15838185
]
Stephen Yuan Jiang commented on HBASE-16786:
[~stack], thanks. Just to clarify, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837320#comment-15837320
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
[~syuanjiang] I took a look. HBASE-16786.master.010.patch removes it. This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837219#comment-15837219
]
Stephen Yuan Jiang commented on HBASE-16786:
[~stack], just realize that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15830834#comment-15830834
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-16786:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2349 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15830305#comment-15830305
]
Appy commented on HBASE-16786:
--
+1
> Procedure V2 - Move ZK-lock's uses to Procedure framework locks
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15830300#comment-15830300
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
-013 addresses @appy comments up on RB. Looking for a +1 here. Thanks.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829459#comment-15829459
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16786:
---
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829330#comment-15829330
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
-012 fixes silly error in TestTokenAuth. TestAcidG seems a flake in this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828999#comment-15828999
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16786:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828730#comment-15828730
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
Rebase after merge removal.
> Procedure V2 - Move ZK-lock's uses to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15827169#comment-15827169
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16786:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15827115#comment-15827115
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
-010 fixes unit tests by making it possible for MOB to obtain lock
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15825648#comment-15825648
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16786:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15825568#comment-15825568
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
Review when you have a chance [~appy] or [~syuanjiang]. Thanks.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15825507#comment-15825507
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16786:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15822690#comment-15822690
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
-008 Is made on top of HBASE-16744. Any chance of review @appy or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15821154#comment-15821154
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
Sounds great.
> Procedure V2 - Move ZK-lock's uses to Procedure framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15817573#comment-15817573
]
Jingcheng Du commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Thanks. That was also what I planned to do :)
> Procedure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15817465#comment-15817465
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Prefer approach 2) as it can clean up disk space for deleted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15816954#comment-15816954
]
Jingcheng Du commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Either retain or clean up the _del files is okay for me.
#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15815313#comment-15815313
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Hi [~jingcheng.du], does that mean there will be no _del
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15815225#comment-15815225
]
Jingcheng Du commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Thanks a lot for the comments!
bq. You mean all MOB deletes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15815097#comment-15815097
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
Thank you [~jingcheng.du] You mean all MOB deletes not all HBase, right?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15814926#comment-15814926
]
Jingcheng Du commented on HBASE-16786:
--
The downside is we have to retain all delete markers in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15814042#comment-15814042
]
stack commented on HBASE-16786:
---
Whats the downside [~jingcheng.du]? Delete markers are small.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15580798#comment-15580798
]
Appy commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Hi [~jingcheng...@intel.com], i don't know mob much to answer that question.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15580792#comment-15580792
]
Appy commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Tested on a 2 node cluster.
Turned on debugging log for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15570583#comment-15570583
]
Jingcheng Du commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Hi [~appy].
The locks is trying to avoid making deleted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15561153#comment-15561153
]
Appy commented on HBASE-16786:
--
Uploaded first version of patch. Still need to figure out how to handle mob
33 matches
Mail list logo