[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16266:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.5)
1.1.6
1.4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391984#comment-15391984
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16281:
---
Something wrong with the jenkins build? I do not think this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391238#comment-15391238
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16266:
---
This is not a big change so let's finish it. Will commit if no
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16280:
-
Summary: Use hash based map in SequenceIdAccounting
Key: HBASE-16280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16280
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391287#comment-15391287
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
I think we should open a new issue to revisit this testcase. We need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390945#comment-15390945
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16278:
---
[~stack] We can find unnecessary CSLM in code and open sub tasks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15388686#comment-15388686
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
The filter logic will be wired if {{KeepDeletedCells}} is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390601#comment-15390601
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-12770:
---
Suggest adding some jitter of the sleep time between the attempt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16278:
--
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Use ConcurrentHashMap instead of ConcurrentSkipListMap if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390508#comment-15390508
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16266:
---
Let's commit and resolve this issue? [~stack]
Thanks.
> Do not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390594#comment-15390594
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16278:
---
This the test result on a machine with 2 * E5-2630 v2, 128G RAM.
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16278:
-
Summary: Use ConcurrentHashMap instead of ConcurrentSkipListMap if
possible
Key: HBASE-16278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16278
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390594#comment-15390594
]
Duo Zhang edited comment on HBASE-16278 at 7/23/16 7:27 AM:
This the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390549#comment-15390549
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
Is the failed UT related?
> Push entries to peer clusters serially
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390596#comment-15390596
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
[~apurtell] Ping.
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-v2.patch
Move LegacyScanQueryMatcher to src/main...
> Refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15388842#comment-15388842
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16266:
---
Add a UT to verify that the modification works?
> Do not throw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-v1.patch
Add a LegacyScanQueryMatcher to keep compatibility if we use filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-14476.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Fixed by HBASE-16135.
> ReplicationQueuesZKImpl#copyQueuesFromRSUsingMulti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15388875#comment-15388875
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
[~ghelmling] What do you think of the new patch?
And I think we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-v6.patch
Move ColumnCount to querymatcher package.
> Refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15401438#comment-15401438
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
I test some of the UTs locally, some of them can not pass, but not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang reopened HBASE-16209:
---
This causes a large set of UTs to fail on branch-1.
See here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16209:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16209-addendum.patch
Addendum fix the region move problem. Will push it to branch-1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch)
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-16209.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Pushed to branch-1.
> Provide an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16309:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio is flaky
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16209:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16209-branch-1-addendum-v2.patch
> Provide an ExponentialBackOffPolicy sleep between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-16209.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Pushed to branch-1.
> Provide an ExponentialBackOffPolicy sleep between failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch)
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch
Retry after fixing the problem introduced by HBASE-16209.
>
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16309:
-
Summary: TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio is flaky
Key: HBASE-16309
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16309
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang reopened HBASE-16209:
---
Sorry I misread the second parameter of invokeAssign... It is different from
the assign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16309:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16309.patch
> TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio is flaky
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch
Retry.
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16280:
--
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Missed one file.
> Use hash based map in SequenceIdAccounting
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16280:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-16280.patch)
> Use hash based map in SequenceIdAccounting
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391387#comment-15391387
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16278:
---
[~ikeda] One problem is that, we may use a byte[] as key multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16280:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Use hash based map in SequenceIdAccounting
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391399#comment-15391399
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16281:
---
+1. Five seconds is too short.
> TestMasterReplication is flaky
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-v5.patch
Change the switch indent in {{StoreScanner}}. It has already been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15400677#comment-15400677
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
The hadoopcheck failure is cause by compiling hbase-assembly which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-v4.patch
Address the comments on rb.
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15400944#comment-15400944
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
I mean why it fails probabilistically? In the most of the failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch
Fix the findbugs and javadoc warnings.
> Refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-branch-1.patch
Patch for branch-1.
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15405176#comment-15405176
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
Fine...
Will commit this evening if no objections.
Thanks.
> Push
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15405134#comment-15405134
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16209:
---
If there is no failure then we should not call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15405399#comment-15405399
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16209:
---
I think the latter implementation(call invoke assign directly if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15403360#comment-15403360
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
OK, the failed UTs are unrelated...
Will commit shortly.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418283#comment-15418283
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16403:
---
You can try the hbase-shaded-client.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418296#comment-15418296
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16403:
---
I believe there is a relocation when shading so the guava inside
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16368:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16368-v1.patch
> test*WhenRegionMove in TestPartialResultsFromClientSide is flaky
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15414661#comment-15414661
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16368:
---
+1.
Let's retry it several times to see if it works as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15407211#comment-15407211
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
For master, I do not think we need to run findbugs on the files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15406950#comment-15406950
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16209:
---
+1 on v5 after you fix the findbugs issue.
Thanks.
> Provide an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16285:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15414889#comment-15414889
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16285:
---
+1.
Will commit shortly.
Thanks.
> Drop RPC requests if it must
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16368:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16368-v1.patch
> test*WhenRegionMove in TestPartialResultsFromClientSide is flaky
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16368:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Pushed to branch-1.1+.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16285:
--
Affects Version/s: 1.4.0
1.3.0
2.0.0
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15415027#comment-15415027
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16386:
---
What happens if the await returns false? Abort because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16368:
--
Labels: trivial (was: )
Fix Version/s: 1.2.3
1.1.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15415029#comment-15415029
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16368:
---
TestPartialResultsFromClientSide has passed all the 3 times.
Let
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15374548#comment-15374548
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16223:
---
This requires changing the logic of {{ScanQueryMatcher}} but it is
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16223:
-
Summary: Drop duplicated delete markers in minor compaction
Key: HBASE-16223
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16223
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15376399#comment-15376399
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16144:
---
[~tedyu] Let's commit v6 patch? The failed UTs are all in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15376163#comment-15376163
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
[~apurtell] That will be awesome, but honestly I do not know if it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225.patch
Modify {{TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook}} to make it pass first.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15387513#comment-15387513
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
The refactor is partially done.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15379155#comment-15379155
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
I need some time...
The logic of ScanQueryMatcher, StoreScanner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16144:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.7
1.2.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16144:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.5)
(was: 1.2.1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15383720#comment-15383720
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16110:
---
Good. Thanks [~busbey].
> AsyncFS WAL doesn't work with Hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15380488#comment-15380488
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
OK, I know, this is an optimization. We create a fake cell first
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16225:
-
Summary: Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
Key: HBASE-16225
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Description: As said in HBASE-16223, the code of {{ScanQueryMatcher}} is
too complicated. I suggest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Description:
As said in HBASE-16223, the code of {{ScanQueryMatcher}} is too complicated. I
suggest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16110:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16110-v1.patch
> AsyncFS WAL doesn't work with Hadoop 2.8+
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15381722#comment-15381722
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
[~ram_krish] Good. Which JIRA?
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15381761#comment-15381761
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
And IMO, the filter based SQM is a 'nice to have'. It does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15381734#comment-15381734
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
{{DeleteTracker}} and {{ColumnTracker}}, hmm... This is another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15380470#comment-15380470
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16225:
---
The most confusing logic for me currently is that, we can get a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15350552#comment-15350552
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16110:
---
[~busbey] Can we have a pre-commit which builds against
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16110:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> AsyncFS WAL doesn't work with Hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16110:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16110.patch
> AsyncFS WAL doesn't work with Hadoop 2.8+
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15354203#comment-15354203
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
OK. Will fix in the next patch. Any questions on the fix?
Thanks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15362038#comment-15362038
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16144:
---
So make it configurable? We should not introduce new findbugs
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16362:
-
Summary: Mob compaction does not set cacheBlocks to false when
creating StoreScanner
Key: HBASE-16362
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16362
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16362:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16362.patch
A trivial fix. Pass false if scanType is not USER_SCAN.
> Mob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16362:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Mob compaction does not set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409072#comment-15409072
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16362:
---
Only MOB and some UTs.
> Mob compaction does not set cacheBlocks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409139#comment-15409139
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-12770:
---
TestLogLevel and TestFilterList are all small tests so the failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16362:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16362:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Component/s: regionserver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16362:
--
Labels: trivial (was: )
> Mob compaction does not set cacheBlocks to false when creating StoreScanner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-9465:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Pushed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413025#comment-15413025
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
The findbugs warnings and failed UTs are unrelated.
Will commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-9465:
-
Affects Version/s: 1.4.0
2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
801 - 900 of 18812 matches
Mail list logo
