epotyom commented on PR #12862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12862#issuecomment-1882551314
@mikemccand oh I just realised that replying to code line comment doesn't
send a notification!
Thank you for reviewing, I listed some alternatives above, but I still think
that
msfroh commented on PR #12995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12995#issuecomment-1882537143
> As far as testing, can we add some unit tests that allocate more than one
chunk and exercise the new functionality? Should we also run some benchmarks to
understand if there's any sort
vsop-479 commented on code in PR #12846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12846#discussion_r1445677720
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/Lucene99SkipWriter.java:
##
@@ -202,7 +202,11 @@ protected void writeSkipData(int level, DataOutput
easyice commented on PR #12997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12997#issuecomment-1882374457
> another approach could consist of filling at most docFreq entries in the
freq buffer
It's a nice idea!
> I didn't know we had such leniency around
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15#issuecomment-1882027747
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #16:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16#issuecomment-1882027687
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #83:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/83#issuecomment-1882027628
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/92#issuecomment-1882027550
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #99:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/99#issuecomment-1882027460
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-1882027391
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/113#issuecomment-1882027328
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/117#issuecomment-1882027252
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #266:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/266#issuecomment-1882027143
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #284:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/284#issuecomment-1882027059
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/285#issuecomment-1882026999
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/295#issuecomment-1882026931
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #328:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/328#issuecomment-1882026857
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/330#issuecomment-1882026779
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/411#issuecomment-1882026665
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/414#issuecomment-1882026595
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/418#issuecomment-1882026525
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/433#issuecomment-1882026451
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/439#issuecomment-1882026368
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/460#issuecomment-1882026303
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/463#issuecomment-1882026237
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/464#issuecomment-1882026172
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/469#issuecomment-1882026092
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/486#issuecomment-1882026028
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/557#issuecomment-1882025949
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12658#issuecomment-1882024454
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
heemin32 commented on PR #12287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12287#issuecomment-1881932572
There are existing tests which should fails.
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/document/TestShapeDocValues.java#L67
However
magibney opened a new pull request, #12999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12999
SurroundQuery still does matching using `java.util.Pattern` (quite slow).
This PR switches over SrndTruncQuery and SrndPrefixQuery to use
Automaton-based matching.
--
This is an
dweiss merged PR #12973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12973
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dweiss commented on code in PR #12973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12973#discussion_r1445347859
##
lucene/queryparser/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/flexible/standard/parser/EscapeQuerySyntaxImpl.java:
##
@@ -40,105 +40,109 @@ public class
dweiss commented on code in PR #12973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12973#discussion_r1445345012
##
lucene/queryparser/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/flexible/standard/parser/EscapeQuerySyntaxImpl.java:
##
@@ -184,7 +186,7 @@ public CharSequence
janhoy closed issue #10343: There may be can simpler in DefaultIndexingChain
[LUCENE-9303]
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10343
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
dweiss commented on PR #12674:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12674#issuecomment-1881823621
Hi @cpoerschke - apologies for the delay. This looks ok to me. It is a pity
the dependency sucks in so much other software (slf4j included). I guess this
is unavoidable if somebody wants
dweiss merged PR #12856:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12856
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dweiss commented on PR #12965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12965#issuecomment-1881815163
Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
dweiss merged PR #12965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12965
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
shaikhu commented on issue #10343:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10343#issuecomment-1881735389
Hi @janhoy @kkewwei, I think this issues can be closed now? It looks like
the followng [PR ](https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2076) fixed the
issue on master.
--
This
zhaih commented on PR #12885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12885#issuecomment-1881591349
Thank you bot I obviously forgot to merge this one. @kuramitsu could you
please add an CHANGES.txt entry under Lucene 9.10?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
jpountz commented on PR #11729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11729#issuecomment-1881513260
Oops, sorry about that. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
mdmarshmallow commented on PR #11729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11729#issuecomment-1881511709
Hi @jpountz, thanks for pushing! I took a look back at the comment and I
think it references some variable names changes that were added with some of
the code changes that weren't
jpountz commented on PR #12997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12997#issuecomment-1881470555
Sorry I might have put you on the wrong track, I didn't know we had such
leniency around frequencies/positions/offsets. Out of curiosity, I tried to add
checks to AssertingLeafReader to
uschindler commented on PR #592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/592#issuecomment-1881225703
Does this also affect `MemorySegmentIndexInput`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
JarvisCraft commented on PR #12295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12295#issuecomment-1881153765
Apologies for the late reply, I've lost the track of the message in the
thread. I will soon coma back to it and see what should be changed.
--
This is an automated message from
easyice commented on code in PR #12997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12997#discussion_r1444747244
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/Lucene99PostingsReader.java:
##
@@ -399,7 +400,9 @@ public PostingsEnum reset(IntBlockTermState termState,
mikemccand commented on PR #12526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12526#issuecomment-188101
> > Maybe we should add OrHighVeryLow to nightly benchy too?
>
> @mikemccand I started looking into this, but my enwiki
(`enwiki-20120502-lines-with-random-label.txt`) seems to
dungba88 commented on PR #12879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12879#issuecomment-1881083302
Thanks @mikemccand for merging
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jpountz commented on PR #12821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12821#issuecomment-1881081841
@SreehariG73 Do you plan on removing the unintended changes?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
jpountz commented on code in PR #12846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12846#discussion_r1444698183
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/Lucene99SkipWriter.java:
##
@@ -202,7 +202,11 @@ protected void writeSkipData(int level, DataOutput
jpountz closed pull request #12526: Speed up disjunctions by computing
estimations of the score of the k-th top hit up-front.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12526
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
jpountz commented on PR #12526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12526#issuecomment-1881064294
I'll reopen when I have time to get back to this, this could be a useful
optimization, though the benefit has become lower thanks to other optimizations
to disjunctions.
--
This is
jpountz commented on PR #11888:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11888#issuecomment-1881059520
@mikemccand I could use your help to review this change, it's quite deep in
the guts of block tree.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
jpountz commented on PR #12035:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12035#issuecomment-1881058014
Sorry for the very long delay. This sort of detection of loop invariants is
indeed handled by C1/C2 compilers, not javac. Without a benchmark suggesting
that there is no performance
mikemccand commented on PR #12535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12535#issuecomment-1881040587
Aha, thank you @uschindler!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
uschindler commented on PR #12535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12535#issuecomment-1881005988
Hi @mikemccand,
I merged this stale PR. Thanks for taking care. Let's see what Jenkins says.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uschindler commented on PR #12914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12914#issuecomment-1881005112
Thanks @gf2121, I merged this stale PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
jpountz commented on PR #11729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11729#issuecomment-1880971838
Hey @mdmarshmallow. There have been some changes in the meantime that
introduced many conflicts, so what I did is that I took your main comment that
describes the OrdinalMap algorithm
jpountz closed pull request #11729: GITHUB#11728: Improve code clarity for
OrdinalMap
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11729
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jpountz closed issue #11728: Improve code clarity for OrdinalMap
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11728
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
easyice commented on code in PR #12996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12996#discussion_r1444591749
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/LZ4WithPresetDictCompressionMode.java:
##
@@ -128,10 +128,12 @@ public void decompress(DataInput in, int
uschindler commented on PR #12135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12135#issuecomment-1880959801
I think we can also close this one, correct? I already closed my proposal:
#12141
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
uschindler commented on PR #12141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12141#issuecomment-1880958137
We have another solution for this already.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
uschindler closed pull request #12141: Avoid duplicate sorting in
KeywordField#newSetQuery (alternative approach)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12141
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
uschindler merged PR #12535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12535
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uschindler merged PR #12914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12914
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jpountz commented on PR #999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/999#issuecomment-1880941055
I'm closing for now, I may revisit this later.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
jpountz closed pull request #999: LUCENE-10634: Speed up WANDScorer.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/999
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
jpountz commented on PR #816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816#issuecomment-1880940378
I'm closing this PR. Since this PR got opened, we removed threadlocals from
`SegmentReader` (#11998) so the number of threadlocal objects no longer scales
with the number of open segments,
jpountz closed pull request #816: LUCENE-10519: Improvement for
CloseableThreadLocal
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
mikemccand commented on PR #592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/592#issuecomment-1880939587
Hello @gf2121! Looks like @uschindler wants you to have to honor of merging
this (now stale!) PR!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mikemccand commented on PR #12966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12966#issuecomment-1880935940
> 3\. Is it important to preserve a default aggregation value of the right
type in the results (i.e. `-1` for int aggregations, `-1f` for float
aggregations)? If not, we can make a
mikemccand commented on code in PR #12966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12966#discussion_r1444557053
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/StringValueFacetCounts.java:
##
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ public FacetResult getTopChildren(int topN, String dim,
sabi0 commented on code in PR #12973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12973#discussion_r1444504974
##
lucene/queryparser/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/flexible/standard/parser/EscapeQuerySyntaxImpl.java:
##
@@ -184,7 +186,7 @@ public CharSequence
mikemccand commented on PR #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/562#issuecomment-1880919115
Hi @gf2121 -- did we ever performance test this change? It sounds
compelling!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/562#issuecomment-1880905213
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #666:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/666#issuecomment-1880905011
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/662#issuecomment-1880905067
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #669:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/669#issuecomment-1880904947
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #670:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/670#issuecomment-1880904898
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/709#issuecomment-1880904794
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #940:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/940#issuecomment-1880904681
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816#issuecomment-1880904741
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #681:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/681#issuecomment-1880904855
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/968#issuecomment-1880904641
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contribution!
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1069#issuecomment-1880904461
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1003#issuecomment-1880904534
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12036#issuecomment-1880903913
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12135#issuecomment-1880903859
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12035:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12035#issuecomment-1880903973
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12157#issuecomment-1880903735
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12141#issuecomment-1880903779
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12172#issuecomment-1880903620
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12258#issuecomment-1880903287
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12207#issuecomment-1880903543
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12237#issuecomment-1880903404
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12262#issuecomment-1880903226
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #12247:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12247#issuecomment-1880903343
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
