[GitHub] [nifi] pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: NIFI-7313:fix bug on 'Quote Table Identifiers'

2020-04-23 Thread GitBox
pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4185#issuecomment-618334632 No it's not, at the top of the pull request you can see that it contains 13 commits, modified 73 files, adds 2046 lines of code and removes 490 lines of code which is much more than yo

[GitHub] [nifi] pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: NIFI-7313:fix bug on 'Quote Table Identifiers'

2020-04-21 Thread GitBox
pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4185#issuecomment-617068158 Can you rebase against master and squash your commits? Right now the PR include commits already merged to master that are unrelated to your change and this makes the PR really hard to

[GitHub] [nifi] pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: NIFI-7313:fix bug on 'Quote Table Identifiers'

2020-04-20 Thread GitBox
pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4185#issuecomment-616639325 It looks good to me. Could you add a unit test to confirm that catalog and schema are correctly quoted? (cc @mattyb149 to have a second pair of eyes). For the unit test, I'd dupl

[GitHub] [nifi] pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: NIFI-7313:fix bug on 'Quote Table Identifiers'

2020-04-17 Thread GitBox
pvillard31 commented on issue #4185: NIFI-7313:fix bug on 'Quote Table Identifiers' URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4185#issuecomment-615274505 Can you revert the Splunk related change and squash your commits? Thanks @wanghongqi --