Jason Gerlowski created SOLR-17345:
--
Summary: Should bin/solr allow short/long opts consistently?
Key: SOLR-17345
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17345
Project: Solr
Issue Ty
Jason Gerlowski created SOLR-17344:
--
Summary: Randomize short/long opts usage in Java-based CLI tests
Key: SOLR-17344
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17344
Project: Solr
Issu
epugh opened a new pull request, #2530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2530
Typos, methods not used, return values not used, that sort of thing.
Flagged by IntelliJ.
Refactoring, so no CHANGES.txt or JIRA.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
gerlowskija commented on code in PR #1768:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1768#discussion_r1651013286
##
solr/bin/solr:
##
@@ -420,14 +420,14 @@ function print_usage() {
echo " you could pass: -j
\"--include-jetty-dir=/etc/jetty/custom/se
bruno-roustant opened a new pull request, #108:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox/pull/108
Added a new section in ENCRYPTION.md, here is an extract for the description:
If you have a Key Management System to manage the encryption key lifecycle,
then you can use the `org.apac
cpoerschke commented on PR #2526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2526#issuecomment-2186391578
> I added a simple resolution test. Testing the distributed behaviour would
mean adding a new test Solr configuration ...
The config APIs could be used instead of having another tes
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #2526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2526#discussion_r1650892906
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/DebugComponent.java:
##
@@ -181,16 +183,28 @@ public void modifyRequest(ResponseBuilder rb,
SearchComponent who
epugh commented on PR #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/257#issuecomment-2186377972
That makes sense!!!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
janhoy commented on PR #106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-site/pull/106#issuecomment-2186363140
> hi @janhoy when are we supposed to see the changes online? I took a look
this morning and it's not there yet?
https://solr.apache.org/blog.html
--
This is an automated message f
cpoerschke merged PR #2238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2238
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/257#discussion_r1650867445
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ Other Changes
* SOLR-17279: Introduce SecurityJson.java file to Test Framework to
consolidate setting up authentication in
noblepaul commented on code in PR #2522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2522#discussion_r1650864722
##
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/servlet/TestRequestRateLimiter.java:
##
@@ -282,4 +289,130 @@ public RateLimitManager build() {
return rateLimitManager;
noblepaul commented on PR #2522:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2522#issuecomment-2186338905
The following are not supported today or they don't have any effect
whatsoever.I think we should just get rid of them and make the feauture
simpler.
```
"guaranteedSlots":5,
"sl
alessandrobenedetti commented on PR #106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-site/pull/106#issuecomment-2186079078
hi @janhoy when are we supposed to see the changes online?
I took a look this morning and it's not there yet?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
14 matches
Mail list logo
