dsmiley commented on pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/349#issuecomment-958100164
I'll commit this tonight.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
dsmiley commented on pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/349#issuecomment-958100164
I'll commit this tonight.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
dsmiley commented on pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/349#issuecomment-953442337
@joel-bernstein I know you've had some concerns about what sort of things
happen without a JIRA so I request your opinion here. The point of this PR is
to:
* Downgrade many depen
dsmiley commented on pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/349#issuecomment-950013908
I wasn't correct about Janino needing to be excluded... I hadn't noticed
it's sha1 change in another change group in IntellliJ.
I'm confused about `versions.props`. I thought
dsmiley commented on pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/349#issuecomment-949042358
I made further improvements, especially in SolrJ.
There is one mystery to me. The license & sha1 check system told me to
remove the ones for Janino but I didn't remove Janino;
