Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-15 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#issuecomment-2228845624 Good thoughts here @janhoy... I will leave this open for another day or so, and then look to commit it. I will put out an appeal to the dev mailing list when 9.7 release process starts

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-15 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#issuecomment-2228245666 It’s the best I could do with my available time. I have NOT done a thorough review of all options in all tools, just fixed the ones causing test failures. The windows script lacks

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-11 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#issuecomment-2223108355 @janhoy, just looking again at this one, thanks for all the efforts This looks like it's ready to commit? However before I click "Squash and merge", I wanted to confirm with you!!

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-03 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on code in PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#discussion_r1663897957 ## solr/bin/solr.cmd: ## @@ -246,11 +246,12 @@ set FIRST_ARG=%1 IF [%1]==[] goto usage -IF "%1"=="-help" goto usage -IF "%1"=="-usage" goto usage -IF "%1"=="-h" goto

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on code in PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#discussion_r1663325672 ## solr/bin/solr.cmd: ## @@ -246,11 +246,12 @@ set FIRST_ARG=%1 IF [%1]==[] goto usage -IF "%1"=="-help" goto usage -IF "%1"=="-usage" goto usage -IF "%1"=="-h" goto

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on code in PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#discussion_r1663323040 ## solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cli/SolrCLI.java: ## @@ -435,11 +503,34 @@ public static boolean exceptionIsAuthRelated(Exception exc) { &&

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
epugh commented on code in PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#discussion_r1663203570 ## solr/bin/solr.cmd: ## @@ -246,11 +246,12 @@ set FIRST_ARG=%1 IF [%1]==[] goto usage -IF "%1"=="-help" goto usage -IF "%1"=="-usage" goto usage -IF "%1"=="-h" goto

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#issuecomment-2200147713 Getting there... All BATS tests now run, except these five: ``` not ok 32 solr help flag prints help in 1521ms # (from function `assert_output' in file

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#issuecomment-2200072644 Just fixed the `test_delete_collection.bats` test (Linux only). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on code in PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#discussion_r1660997239 ## solr/bin/solr: ## @@ -982,31 +982,10 @@ else exit fi +# status tool if [ "$SCRIPT_CMD" == "status" ]; then - if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then -while true; do -

Re: [PR] SOLR-16824: Back port to branch 9x [solr]

2024-07-02 Thread via GitHub
janhoy commented on PR #2540: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540#issuecomment-2197768183 Pushed some commits that at least makes Solr compile, and Fixes HealthCheckToolTest. I propose that we revert most .bats files to testing original (deprecated) options, so we know the