[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064483#comment-13064483
]
Igor Galić commented on TS-856:
---
{noformat}
<@postwait> jMCg: the code changes look fine
<@postw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064514#comment-13064514
]
taoyunxing commented on TS-872:
---
I make a fresh operation including config,make and install, and
TSFetchRestpGet(), TSFetchPageResptGet() and TSFetchUrl() have incorrect asserts
Key: TS-875
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-875
Project: Traffic Server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjesh Nilange updated TS-875:
---
Attachment: inkapi.patch
Patch for InkAPI.cc
> TSFetchRestpGet(), TSFetchPageResptGet() and TSFetchUrl()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjesh Nilange updated TS-875:
---
Description:
The asserts cause TS to crash when these API functions are used. The asserts
are incorrect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064740#comment-13064740
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-875:
--
That's not confusing at all :) Why are the APIs using TSH
forward map based on request receive port
-
Key: TS-876
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-876
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Remap API
Rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjesh Nilange updated TS-876:
---
Attachment: map_with_recv_port.patch
This patch introduces a new forward map directive - 'map_with_recv_p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064808#comment-13064808
]
Manjesh Nilange commented on TS-875:
Yeah, ideally they should be a different data type.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom resolved TS-853.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Plugin examples should be updated to use the sockaddr API instead of the
> deprecated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-876:
-
Fix Version/s: 3.1.0
Assignee: Leif Hedstrom
> forward map based on request receive port
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-875:
-
Backport to Version: 3.0.1
Fix Version/s: 3.1.0
Assignee: Leif Hedstrom
> TSFetchRes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064824#comment-13064824
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-876:
--
Quick nit-picky comment: remap.config is not the "source"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom reopened TS-875:
--
Reopening, since we'll want to commit this for 3.0.1 if it passes the votes.
> TSFetchRestpGet(), TSFetchPageR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manjesh Nilange updated TS-876:
---
Attachment: map_with_recv_port_v2.patch
Modified patch. The old patch was not handling the case when the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064851#comment-13064851
]
Manjesh Nilange commented on TS-876:
Oh, I forgot to mention that I'm working off 2.1.7. T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064852#comment-13064852
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-876:
--
That would explain the old filename (remap.config vs the
Segfault caused by HTTPInfo::object_key_get
Key: TS-877
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-877
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Bug
Components: HTTP
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom updated TS-877:
-
Due Date: 30/Dec/11
> Segfault caused by HTTPInfo::object_key_get
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065001#comment-13065001
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-877:
--
Looking at how this API is used, I'm wondering (but, far,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065004#comment-13065004
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-877:
--
Another thought could be that the cache got corrupted. As
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065006#comment-13065006
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-877:
--
Looking at the code, at a minimum we should apply this "o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065008#comment-13065008
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-877:
--
And, we should probably figure out why m_alt is NULL stil
ATS3.0 frequently shows Broken pipe and exit !
--
Key: TS-878
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-878
Project: Traffic Server
Issue Type: Bug
Components: HTTP
Affects Versio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065011#comment-13065011
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-878:
--
This is running inside GDB I assume? This is a "misfeatur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065025#comment-13065025
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-878:
--
I should point out, pay attention to the GDB configuratio
26 matches
Mail list logo
