Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1239#discussion_r90559251
--- Diff: proxy/logstats.cc ---
@@ -1164,16 +1167,64 @@ update_schemes(OriginStats *stat, int scheme, int
size
Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1239#discussion_r90557544
--- Diff: proxy/logstats.cc ---
@@ -594,15 +594,16 @@ struct CommandLineArgs {
int64_t min_hits;
int max_age;
int line_len
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1050
It's fixed elsewhere?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user zwoop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1246
TS-5069: Fixes CID 1366771 and 1366771
These might be older, but this last batch of commits in TS-5069 triggers
Coverity.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1246
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1245
clang-format :).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1209
@SolidWallOfCode Did you make the fixes to the unit tests ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user zwoop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1247
TS-5078: Support MADV_DONTDUMP even when the freelist is disabled
I'm a little bit on this ice here, Phil already gave advice on some
details, but this should be properly reviewed (of course
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1249
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1247
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1229
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1229
Well dammit, I screwed up, this PR was against the 7.0.x branch :-/ Can you
please make a new PR against master please? I will undo the 7.0.x commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1245
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1239
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1229
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop closed the issue at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1301
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1301
This really belongs on the us...@trafficserver.apache.org mailing list. I'm
going to close this, but the short answer is that you could use the
parent.config instead of remap.
---
If your
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1297
I think the Jenkins master was wedged, trying a new build [approve ci].
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1299
[add to whitelist]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1294
I'm seeing e.g.
```
BIO_fastopen.cc: In function 'int fastopen_create(BIO*)':
BIO_fastopen.cc:48:11: error: 'BIO' has no member named 'data'
BIO_set_data(bio, data
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1294
[add to whitelist]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1257
[add to whitelist]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1298
@randall We only saw this once so far, right? It might be worth trying
turning off HostDB syncing again, now that we can do that (supposedly safely)
in 7.x ?
---
If your project is set up
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1276
Marking this for 6.2.2 for now, unless we need to respond 6.2.1? Also, this
has build issues I think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1306
Yeh, I agree with peach, it seems very odd that it's not picking it up
properly. It'd be better to fix that, instead of ifdef on openbsd IMO.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1303
We need into 7.1.x as well, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1308
CID 1368316 & 1368315: Leaks and NULL references
I think this landed recently (TS-5092?), and we have to fix this for 7.1.x.
clang-analyzer also detects the NULL pointer reference.
Github user zwoop closed the issue at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1305
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1305
Closing this as a dupe of #1308, since it has more details.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1276
Trying a new build [approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1291
CID 1196420: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN): proxy/CoreUtils.cc
```
*** CID 1196420: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN)
/proxy/CoreUtils.cc: 482 in CoreUtils
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1286
CID 1367521: Low impact quality (MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT):
tsconfig/Errata.h and tsconfig/TsValue.h
```
*** CID 1367521: Low impact quality (MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT)
/lib/tsconfig
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1282
Do we just ignore /kill all clustering issues?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1284
CID 1367523:(MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT): tsconfig/IntrusivePtr.
```
*** CID 1367523:(MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT)
/lib/tsconfig/IntrusivePtr.h: 134 in ()
128 ownded by a set
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1285
CID 1367522:(MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT): /ts/Ptr.h
```
*** CID 1367522:(MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT)
/lib/ts/Ptr.h: 101 in ()
95
96
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1280
CID 1367529: Security best practices violations (STRING_OVERFLOW):
url_sig/url_sig.c
```
*** CID 1367529: Security best practices violations (STRING_OVERFLOW)
/plugins/experimental
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1279
CID 1367531: Uninitialized members (UNINIT_CTOR): proxy/main.cc
```
*** CID 1367531: Uninitialized members (UNINIT_CTOR)
/proxy/Main.cc: 352 in MemoryLimit::MemoryLimit()()
346
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1282
CID 1367527: Program hangs (SLEEP): cluster/ClusterCom.cc
```
*** CID 1367527: Program hangs (SLEEP)
/mgmt/cluster/ClusterCom.cc: 1953 in
ClusterCom::sendReliableMessage(unsigned long
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1281
CID 1367528: Security best practices violations (STRING_OVERFLOW):
http/HttpTransactHeaders.cc
```
*** CID 1367528: Security best practices violations (STRING_OVERFLOW)
/proxy/http
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1290
CID 1367516: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL): wccp/WccpConfig.cc
```
*** CID 1367516: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL)
/lib/wccp/WccpConfig.cc: 528 in wccp::CacheImpl
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1289
CID 1367517: API usage errors (LOCK): mgmt/FileManager.cc
```
*** CID 1367517: API usage errors (LOCK)
/mgmt/FileManager.cc: 97 in FileManager::~FileManager()()
91
92
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1288
CID 1367518:(LOCK): records/P_RecCore.cc
```
*** CID 1367518:(LOCK)
/lib/records/P_RecCore.cc: 751 in RecSyncConfigToTB(textBuffer *, bool *)()
745 break
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1287
CID 1367519: Low impact quality (MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT): ts/ink_memory.h
```
*** CID 1367519: Low impact quality (MISSING_MOVE_ASSIGNMENT)
/lib/ts/ink_memory.h: 242 in ()
236
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1283
CID 1367526: CID 1367525 : money_trace/money_trace.cc
```
*** CID 1367526: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL)
/plugins/experimental/money_trace/money_trace.cc: 57
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1292
Meh, there's already a PR for this, nm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1292
CID 1367515, CID 1367514, CID 1367513: ts_lua plugin
```
*** CID 1367515: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN)
/plugins/experimental/ts_lua/ts_lua_server_response.c: 354
Github user zwoop closed the issue at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1292
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1302
CID 1368306 & 1368305: NULLPTR and security BP in logical.cc
```c
** CID 1368306: Security best practices violations (TOCTOU)
/proxy/logcat.cc: 299 in
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1184
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1224
This needs to run clang-format again. Please rebase and push the PR again,
and I'll land it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1184
This needs to run clang-format again. Please rebase and push the PR again,
and I'll land it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1184
I'm gonna merge this, and fix the clang-format separately. Please make an
effort to always run clang-format though :).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1184
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user zwoop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1273
TS-5030: Fixes the sizeof issues, adds a constant
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zwoop/trafficserver TS-5030
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/996
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1273
Try again [approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1273
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1610
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1608#discussion_r108462625
--- Diff: proxy/http/HttpConfig.cc ---
@@ -1129,6 +1129,8 @@ HttpConfig::startup()
// Local Manager
HttpEstablishStaticConfigLongLong
Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1608#discussion_r108462430
--- Diff: proxy/http/HttpConfig.h ---
@@ -824,6 +824,8 @@ struct HttpConfigParams : public ConfigInfo {
MgmtInt
Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1608#discussion_r108463799
--- Diff: ci/tsqa/tests/test_forward_proxy.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+'''
--- End diff --
If at all possible, can you convert
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1604
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1546
Is there a reason why this hasn't landed? if not, land it :).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1568
@bryancall Ping?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1540
@jablko Can you review this please? And also, I think your MATT connection
needs to be redone, since we got moved to gitbox for the internal ASF sync
service).
---
If your project is set up
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1600
Cherry-picked to 7.1.x, seems safe, and very reasonable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1606
Why was this merged without setting appropriate labels / versions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1547
@persiaAziz This does not cherry-pick cleanly to 7.1.0, so if we want this
for 7.1.x branch, can you please make another PR, against the 7.1.x branch?
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user zwoop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1620
Adds a new condition, %{IP:}
This replaces the old %{CLIENT-IP}, and generalizes the access to
all four IP addresses. E.g.
cond %{SEND_RESPONSE_HDR_HOOK}
set-header X
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1583
I've been running with this on docs for a few days, with no problem. It
does not seem to address the threads running at 100% CPU at times though. But
assuming this fixes another problem
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1612
Cherry picked to 7.1.x
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1612
Moved to 7.1.0, I think this is a good patch + good fix!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1602
Not reloadable. The setting restores the old/expected behavior, meaning
1. It will not let you start traffic_server with a bad ssl_multicert.config
2. It will not replace
Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1623#discussion_r109090078
--- Diff: proxy/logging/LogBuffer.cc ---
@@ -112,14 +112,6 @@ LogBufferHeader::log_filename()
return addr
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1587
Intermittent regression test failures (debug build)
Seeing this on some VMs:
```
REGRESSION TEST SDK_API_HttpTxnTransform started
[SDK_API_HttpTxnTransform] TSTransformCreate
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1548
I'm fine with this. However, seeing that the two policy implementations has
virtually identical implementations here, it begs the question as to why this
is not in a base class? It seems
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1588
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1593
Thread "hangs" on Docs
Running latest 7.1.x branch on Docs with #1583 as well, I started seeing a
thread consuming a *lot* of CPU. In the order of 1000x more than the other
thread
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1497
Yeh, that's fine, I upgraded Sphinx long ago on the Docs build box.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1592
Why did the AU check fail? Did you forget to rebase? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1577
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user zwoop opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1578
Add missing include, which otherwise breaks on OSX
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zwoop/trafficserver CMATH
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1578
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1577
Please file an Issue on the cleanup task, so we know about it, and it gets
assigned.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1577
I think we need to make the AU check succeed, right ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1568
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1576#discussion_r106004593
--- Diff: tests/tools/microServer/uWServer.py ---
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1586
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1583
This sounds like a 7.1.0 candidate?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1580
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1548
@jrushford Do you want this in 7.1.0? If not, move it out to 7.2.0 please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user zwoop opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1582
Make regex_revalidate.c use ref-counted config data
Instead of scheduling a "delete" of the data sometime in the future, a more
reliable pattern is to ref-count the configurations, a
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1552
@shukitchan You ok with this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1552
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1550
[approve ci] to see if the FreeBSD builds succeed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1371
[approve ci]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user zwoop commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1517
Note that it has to succeed on CentOS6, which is indeed running
```
[root@centos6 ~]# bison --version
bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.1
```
---
If your project is set up
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1576
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
701 - 800 of 896 matches
Mail list logo
