On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:15:36PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> I also have to admit that I did the tests before the last commit in
> the 1.0 branch, which also addresses an issue that could be the cause
> of the segfault that I got.
>
please re-test.
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into y
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 22:12:34 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 16:20:13 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:29:28AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > thanks, no segfaults anymore and valgrind is happy, too.
> > >
> > good
> >
> > > Btw., I'm plannin
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 16:20:13 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:29:28AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > thanks, no segfaults anymore and valgrind is happy, too.
> >
> good
>
> > Btw., I'm planning to do some compatibility tests with the old isync
> > 0.9.2 from Debian
